Search for: "Does 1-95"
Results 241 - 260
of 3,681
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2018, 9:57 am
The mark was contested by Van Haren, and ultimately ended up with the CJEU.The referring court asked, in essence, "…whether Article 3(1)(e)(iii) of Directive 2008/95 must be interpreted as meaning that a sign consisting of a colour applied to the sole of a high-heeled shoe… consists exclusively of a ‘shape’, within the meaning of that provision".Stephanie had to forget her 'totally unique' shoe design after the decisionThe Court… [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 9:57 am
The mark was contested by Van Haren, and ultimately ended up with the CJEU.The referring court asked, in essence, "…whether Article 3(1)(e)(iii) of Directive 2008/95 must be interpreted as meaning that a sign consisting of a colour applied to the sole of a high-heeled shoe… consists exclusively of a ‘shape’, within the meaning of that provision".Stephanie had to forget her 'totally unique' shoe design after the decisionThe Court… [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
Koenderman, JCC -------- Notes: 1. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 2:44 pm
Id. at *1. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 8:25 am
If gaiters are worn, they should have two layers of fabric or be folded to make two layers.Mask should fit snugly but comfortably against the side of the face.Mask should be a solid piece of material without slits, exhalation valves, or punctures.The following attributes are additionally acceptable as long as masks meet the requirements above.Masks can be either manufactured or homemade.Masks can be reusable or disposable.Masks can have inner filter pockets.Clear masks or cloth masks with a clear… [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 2:49 am
Does anyone know? [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 1:52 am
"1.3 In comparison to above claim, claim 1 of the main request has been amended as follows:"1. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:45 am
Does the finding that (a disclosure in) a prior art document D1 does not qualify as an accidental anticipation (thus not allowing the use of an undisclosed disclaimer) because it does not fulfill the criterion laid down in G 1/03 that it is so unrelated to and remote from the claimed invention that the skilled person would never have taken it into consideration when making the invention, imply that it is automatically relevant for inventive step? [read post]
1 May 2017, 8:10 am
Suppose Shark had a valid test that showed superiority at the 95% confidence level, but Dyson had 19 valid tests that showed no superiority at the 95% confidence level. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm
Kopec v City of Elmhurst, 193 F3d at 896, 904; Weiner v City College of City Univ. of New York, 1997 WL 381799, *1, *4, 1997 US Dist LEXIS 9705, *2, *13 [SD NY, July 9, 1997, No. 95 Civ 10892 (JFK)]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm
Kopec v City of Elmhurst, 193 F3d at 896, 904; Weiner v City College of City Univ. of New York, 1997 WL 381799, *1, *4, 1997 US Dist LEXIS 9705, *2, *13 [SD NY, July 9, 1997, No. 95 Civ 10892 (JFK)]). [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 4:23 am
How does one square these contradictory settings? [read post]
17 May 2022, 9:05 pm
Item 3 of Article 95 permits SCA suits in response to misrepresentations. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
R 27a does not then apply, because the application does not contain any sequences, despite the fact that the invention refers to nucleotides or amino acids. [read post]
17 May 2011, 2:17 pm
While we make no guarantees and our past performance does not guarantee a particular outcome in your case, we have been able to secure a reduction or a dismissal in about 95% of the traffic infraction cases (such as speeding) that we have handled in the Ardsley Village Court. [read post]
17 May 2011, 2:17 pm
While we make no guarantees and our past performance does not guarantee a particular outcome in your case, we have been able to secure a reduction or a dismissal in about 95% of the traffic infraction cases (such as speeding) that we have handled in the Ardsley Village Court. [read post]
17 May 2011, 2:17 pm
While we make no guarantees and our past performance does not guarantee a particular outcome in your case, we have been able to secure a reduction or a dismissal in about 95% of the traffic infraction cases (such as speeding) that we have handled in the Ardsley Village Court. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
The ED based its reasoning in particular on considerations regarding the legal security of third parties. [7] The board does not agree with the ED’s interpretation of A 76(1), second sentence, EPC 1973. [read post]
18 May 2015, 12:59 pm
The 95 percent card-present threshold only applies to point-of-sale terminals, excludes card-not-present transactions, and does not require a chip card or a chip-on-chip transaction. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 1:26 pm
Then he paints 95 percent of the entire house and I tell him "sorry sucker! [read post]
