Search for: "Downloader 88" Results 241 - 260 of 388
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Hence, the condition defined in decisions G 2/88 and G 6/88 to recognise novelty of the use of a known compound for a particular purpose is therefore here not fulfilled. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This amendment is considered by the [patent proprietor] to represent a mere correction under R 139 of the wording of claim 1 as granted. [4] R 139 (former R 88 EPC 1973) provides in its second sentence that a correction of errors in documents filed with the EPO that concerns the description, claims or drawings can only be allowed if the correction is obvious in the sense that it is immediately evident that nothing else would have been intended than what is offered as correction. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 9:14 pm by Jennings Strouss & Salmon
The complete report can be downloaded from the OCC Web site, www.occ.gov. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 5:07 am by Katherine Gundersen
One of the ICO's criteria for selecting bodies for monitoring is that "less than 85% of requests are receiving a response within the appropriate timescales".The statistics can be downloaded as a pdf, or in Excel or CSV format. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
It is for this reason also that D6 alone should not be admitted into the proceedings, because no reasoning based on D6 alone has been submitted during the appeal proceedings.As D6 is cited in the application underlying the opposed patent, the [opponent] considers that it automatically has to be part of the proceedings, in application of decision T 536/88.The Board does not share this opinion. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
I may be wrong, but I have the impression that the present decision is not as strict as what we usually see in A 123(2) assessments.To download the whole decision (in French), click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:34 pm
7,346,545 claims a method of online media product distribution, using the media as bait to shove advertising before a user. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The competent BoA in cases T 472/88 [2] as well as T 326/02 [6.1-5] and T 381/02 [2] come to the same conclusion as decision T 301/87.These relevant decisions of the BoA distinguish between factual amendments, which are to be examined in view of compliance with the requirements of the EPC pursuant to A 102(3) EPC 1973, and between merely formal, syntactical claim amendments, which do not give rise to a new objection outside A 100.[2.4] The Board adopts this view in the present… [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Consequently, the BoA considers that in the present case, exceptionally, a detailed cost calculation is superfluous.Should you wish to download the whole decision (in German), just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In this respect the appeal proceedings aim at providing an independent judicial review of the administrative decisions of the EPO, which have to be strictly distinguished from the appeal proceedings, in view of their correctness from a factual, procedural and substantive point of view (T 26/88; T 611/90; T 34/90; T 534/89; T 506/91)It follows from this alone that there are certain limits for the way in which parties can conduct appeal proceedings. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
As the remittal is the consequence of a substantial procedural violation, the reimbursement of the appeal fee under R 103(1)(a) is equitable in the Board’s judgment.Should you wish to download the whole decision, click here.You can find the file wrapper here. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 5:55 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(..) refrigerator.Lucien FreudLucien Freud died Wednesday at age 88. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 9:52 am by Christopher Danzig
My 88-year-old grandfather can play — and win — fantasy golf on his iMac, so there’s no excuse.I have a feeling there are a lot of similar horror stories floating around, so please share in the comments or send me an email at cdanzig@gmail.com.Christopher Danzig is a writer in Oakland, California. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
But that is another matter.To download the whole decision, click here. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In decision G 2/88, the Enlarged Board of Appeal was concerned with questions relating to A 123(3) with respect to a change in category from a claim for a physical entity to a claim for a second non-medical use. [read post]
31 May 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
It pointed out that as the patent lapsed several years ago, in accordance with R 84(1) and in line with decisions such as T 329/88, T 749/01 and T 1128/07, the present appeal proceedings should be terminated.According to the patent proprietor, R 84(1) did not make any distinction between oppositions filed before or after expiry of the patent. [read post]
25 May 2011, 3:27 pm by John Steele
Decision (88 pages): Download Thereasense en banc Discussion at Patently-O. [read post]