Search for: "Duncan v. United States"
Results 241 - 260
of 368
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:06 pm
Kholi, No. 09-868 (2011); Duncan v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 10:22 pm
The canon against superfluity assists only where a competing interpretation gives effect " 'to every clause and word of a statute.' " Duncan v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:08 pm
S. 167, 174 (2001) (quoting United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 11:14 am
Duncan v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 2:08 pm
Duncan v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 11:46 am
In United States v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:35 am
However, the United States is not a party to that treaty. [read post]
13 May 2011, 6:29 am
" Id. at *2 (quoting Duncan v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am
[Update] On 6 May 2011 Mr Justice Tugendhat gave judgment in the case of Bacon v Automattic [2011] EWHC 1072 (QB) – a Norwich Pharmacal application in which he held that the operators of WordPress and Wikipedia could be served with the order in the United States by Email. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am
Again, this opinion is valid only for the State of Massachusetts and not Utah. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:08 pm
Addressing the e-waste crisis: the need for comprehensive federal e-waste regulation within the United States. 14 Chapman L. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:10 am
Murray (IP finance) United States US Patent Reform America Invents Act: First to Invent v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:17 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 2:50 pm
United States, No. 08-99031. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 5:41 am
Cuomo, 66 NY2d 185, 190-191 [1985], citing United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
Duncan v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:02 pm
Duncan. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm
The rule that disqualifies persons who are not 35 years of age from eligibility for the Presidency of the United States is quite hard or rigid. [read post]
