Search for: "Fee v. Fee" Results 241 - 260 of 31,270
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2009, 9:38 am
Missouri (08-822) and Anderson v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 3:31 pm by Jacek Stramski
Advanced Chiropractic and Rehabilitation Center Corp. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2024, 10:54 am by bklemm@foley.com
The Federal Register Notice states that “[t]here is no specific language required for the written assertion, but it should be readily identifiable on the IDS and clearly convey the applicable IDS size fee by specifying the particular paragraph in § 1.17(v) that applies (e.g., “the fee due under 1.17(v)(2)”), if any. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 9:09 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
When courts examine whether to award fees, it will look to whether the plaintiff obtained significant relief - and the most significant relief a plaintiff can obtain usually is an injunction.Such was the case in the hotly-contested suit Western Insulation v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 3:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The law firm contends it is owed legal fees by Chang in the principal amount of $438,31 I .19 for legal services rendered in pursuit of three related cases involving Chang as follows: Citidress II Cora. v, 207 Second Avenue Realtv Carp, , Index No.121848199 ("Citidress"), Gold Citv Commercial Bank v. 207 Second Avenue Corp, Index No. 104319 /93 ("Gold City") and Janet Chang, as assignee v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 8:15 am
The complaint (full text) in Forest Area Bible Church v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 3:43 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  This was a garden or varietal version of a fee demand, legal malpractice counterclaim. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 3:28 am
  Bender Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP v Simon ;2009 NY Slip Op 06296 ;Decided on August 25, 2009 ; Appellate Division, First Department holds that plaintiff, who is defending a fee claim, is unable to prove legal malpractice, but has demonstrated a question of whether the law firm is aptly holding escrowed monies or not. [read post]