Search for: "First v. Armes (1983)"
Results 241 - 260
of 383
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2012, 12:42 am
The Supreme Court first recognized this narrow exception to the warrant requirement in Terry v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 8:24 am
All three of these Reagan justices were in the majority in Bush v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:49 pm
Dillon, 34 Cal.3d 441, 479, 194 Cal.Rptr. 390, 668 P.2d 697 (1983) (emphasis added). [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
First, liberty of the press, at a minimum, meant that a government could not require prior approval for someone to publish a work. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
In another he lost an arm; but though he had but one eye and one arm, he was always the first in the fight and the last out. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 12:53 am
Boumediene v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:33 am
§ 704(b), which makes it a crime to falsely represent that you have been awarded any decoration or medal authorized by Congress for the Armed Forces of the United States, is facially invalid under the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 5:34 am
Code § 1983. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 12:32 pm
Writing in 1983, Don B. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:04 am
§ 1983; see also Montero v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 8:39 am
Versiglio v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 9:27 pm
Getz v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 10:14 am
But in Section 1983 cases, the defendants can appeal right away if they claim qualified immunity from liability. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:38 am
App. 1983)). [read post]
8 May 2011, 11:58 am
CONCERNED ABOUT LOUISIANA PLAN TO CUT HOME MEDICAID SERVICES, Pitts v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 1:19 pm
’ United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 9:33 am
First, absolute immunity is generally available to prosecutors for conduct that “is intimately associated with the judicial phase of the criminal process,” Imbler v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:16 am
City of Canton v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 8:26 pm
In Canton v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 4:49 am
See Monell v. [read post]
