Search for: "Flower v. United States" Results 241 - 260 of 394
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2015, 2:18 pm by Chuck Cosson
”  With few exceptions, the first 200-odd years of Privacy in the Unites States primarily concerned contexts where the identifiable nature of the data in question was not seriously in doubt. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 8:35 am by Steve Lubet
  While most states are content to have an official flower and bird, Arkansas has become the only state with an official version of the Decalogue. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 7:15 pm by Maureen Johnston
United States 14-874Issue: Whether in light of Flower v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 12:57 pm by Linda Holmes
  Hearts, candy, flowers, and dinner dates are all symbols and activities of this special day. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 2:47 am
.Van Gogh always found it more difficult topaint genetically modified flowersControversiesThe patenting of ‘life’ creates ethical dilemmas. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by Illinois BLJ
United States, SCOTUS Blog (Nov. 14, 2014), http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/yates-v-united-states/. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 9:45 pm
EAI operates a franchise network of over 1,200 independent owner-operated franchise locations throughout the United States and internationally. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 am by Jani
The answer, at least on the outset, is not an obvious one, but was faced by the United Kingdom Court of Appeals over a decade ago.The case in question is 1-800 Flowers Inc v Phonenames Ltd, decided in the very first year of the second millennium, which dealt with the phone number "800-FLOWERS", registered in the US as a trademark in the mid 1980s by the company 800-Flowers Inc. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 6:09 am
The ultimate flowering of criminal mini-states can be found in Somalia, where warlords have waged endless coups. [read post]
20 May 2014, 4:51 am by SHG
Johnson (1989) and United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 12:18 pm by Milord A. Keshishian
Plaintiff alleges that Defendants approached Plaintiff about a possible collaboration to distribute the toy outside of the United States, which Plaintiff declined. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 12:18 pm
Plaintiff alleges that Defendants approached Plaintiff about a possible collaboration to distribute the toy outside of the United States, which Plaintiff declined. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Both federal and state environmental review were necessitated for the project, however the appellate court only reviewed the relevant state law issues. [read post]