Search for: "General Foods Corp. v. General Foods, Inc"
Results 241 - 260
of 868
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
Section 403(r)(6) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) (21 U.S.C. 343(r)(6)) requires that a manufacturer of a dietary supplement making a nutritional deficiency, structure/function, or general well-being claim have substantiation that the claim is truthful and not misleading. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
Heinz Co., Frito-Lay, Kettle Foods Inc., and Lance Inc.. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 8:08 am
Likening the claims to those found ineligible in SmartGene, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:25 am
ConAgra Foods, Inc., 2012 WL 6569393 (N.D. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:53 am
The First Department recently relied upon the Deerin rule to affirm disqualification in Poretsky v Bartleby and Sage, Inc. (203 AD3d 523 [1st Dept 2022]). [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 6:11 pm
Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. v. f’real Foods, LLC, 908 F.3d 1328, 1339 (Fed. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
(IPKat) (IPKat) IPO launches ‘Supply Chain Toolkit’ best practice toolkit for avoiding fake goods entering business supply chains (IPKat) Welsh patent applications: the results are in (IPKat) United States US General Government blocks release of documents on secret IP enforcement treaty, ACTA (EFF) Potential names for Obama IP team swirl; WTO IP Chief ‘imminent’ (Intellectual Property Watch) John W Thompson leading candidate for Commerce… [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 9:06 am
Lockheed Martin Corp. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(Spicy IP) Global credit crisis leads to boom times for legal process outsourcing businesses specialising in IP (Spicy IP) Israel Israeli bakery Matzot Aviv files trade mark infringement suit against rival Patisserie Aviv and US importer Bagel Bites (The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office relaxes conditions for modified examination (The IP Factor) Italy Italian Supreme Court recognises ‘post sale confusion’ in criminal proceedings concerning sales of… [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 4:56 am
” And in Lloyd Capital Corp. v Pat Henchar, Inc. (80 NY2d 124 [1992]), the Court addressed the dichotomy under New York law of illegality based upon “malum in se, or evil in itself,” and “malum prohibitum,” or evil merely because it is prohibited. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
Fast v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm
Haldex Brake Products Corp (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Inequitable conduct pleading must allege how examiner would have used undisclosed information: SynQor, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 5:14 pm
" (TTABlogged here).CDS, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 3:31 am
ITC Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
Catskill Mountain Mechanical Corp. and its alter ego, Plant Maintenance Services, Inc. (3-CA-26213; 352 NLRB No. 101) West Coxsackie, NY June 30, 2008. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 10:24 am
Statistical Sampling and Class Member Standing In Tyson Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 10:04 am
Jamesbury Corp. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam… [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:31 pm
Mo. 2002); see generally Schwarz Pharma, Inc. v. [read post]