Search for: "Glass v. Glass" Results 241 - 260 of 2,520
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2018, 12:42 pm
  And if you do all that when you're on probation, and hence subject to a search condition, wow, that's incredibly unwise.But when you do all this and you have some methamphetamine and a glass pipe in that same purse, well, at that point, I don't know what advise I can give you.The defendant here, Beatrice Aguirre, actually gets an amazing deal; she gets to plead guilty to only a single count of forgery for all of the above. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 1:40 pm
He broke into nine urn niches located in one of the mausoleum walls by smashing the glass panes enclosing each niche. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 10:35 am
 Grandmother forgets to close the back sliding glass door, which is the only access to the pool from the house. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 12:26 pm by Dave Hoffman
 Several of the attendees at the Conference approached me and remarked on my posts from CELS V, IV, and III. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 2:14 pm
This is why despite the inherent risk clause, many teams have increased their protective glass and netting surrounding areas where such injuries are most likely to occur. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 6:43 am by Schachtman
Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC, C.A. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 12:54 pm by CJLF Staff
Supreme Court decision stemming from Hurst v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:27 am by lawmrh
In blogging a few days ago about prosecutors and “Brick-throwing from glass houses,” I’d mentioned that the decision in Thompson v Connick was still pending. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 7:24 am by Docket Navigator
"[Plaintiff] contends an argument for an improper venue was available to Defendants, and has been since 1957 when the Supreme Court announced [Fourco Glass Co. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 7:40 am by Docket Navigator
Accordingly, the Court finds that TC Heartland does not qualify for the intervening law exception to waiver because it merely affirms the viability of [Fourco Glass Co. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 8:47 am
 The judge's basic position was that the test was what the judge could see with his own eyes, rather than focusing on a close verbal analysis of the glasses' respective features.The next case under analysis was the CJEU ruling in Karen Millen v Dunnes Stores [noted by the IPKat here]. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 3:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Once, the Corning glass works were a behemoth in upstate New York. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 5:45 am
Nelson (University of Houston), and Roberto Tallarita (Harvard Law School), on Wednesday, November 14, 2018 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]