Search for: "Grant v. Department of Corrections" Results 241 - 260 of 3,035
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2022, 6:27 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, a summary order issued on October 18. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 6:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court granted the Department's motion on the ground that the proceeding was time-barred, and dismissed the proceeding. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 11:00 pm by Rosalind English
 The correct appreciation of the effect of Pankina was apparent in R (on the application of Nough) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2010) EWHC 2218 (Admin). [read post]
25 May 2014, 10:36 am by Howard Friedman
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, 2014 Pa. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:34 am by Marty Lederman
  That ought to be reason enough for the Supreme Court to grant certiorari and to correct the court of appeals' errors with dispatch, despite the case's interlocutory posture. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:26 am by Laura Sandwell
Zoumbas v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 28 October 2013. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 7:52 am
  The trial court further ordered that the Department of Corrections was authorized to remit payment of the court-imposed costs and fees from Jackson’s prison account under MCL § 769.1l. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 11:47 am
("The named defendant.... appeals from the trial court’s decision overruling its objection, on collateral estoppel grounds, to the application for a prejudgment remedy filed by the plaintiff, the state of Connecticut, on behalf of its department of public works and its department of correction. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 11:47 am
("The named defendant.... appeals from the trial court’s decision overruling its objection, on collateral estoppel grounds, to the application for a prejudgment remedy filed by the plaintiff, the state of Connecticut, on behalf of its department of public works and its department of correction. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 4:34 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Indeed, defendant was correct in that respect because the codefendant's "attorney took an aggressive adversarial stance against [defendant at trial], in effect becoming a second prosecutor" (People v Cardwell, 78 NY2d 996, 998). [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:26 pm by NARF
New Mexico Taxation & Revenue Department (Taxation) Mathieu v. [read post]