Search for: "Gray v. HAS" Results 241 - 260 of 1,977
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2017, 5:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
*Citing Paul v NYC Department of Education, 146 AD3d 705, the Appellate Division, rejecting Coach's contention that hearsay testimony should not have been admitted at the hearing, holding that the hearing officer "was entitled to rely on hearsay" in sustaining the U-Rating give Coach. * In Gray v Adduci, 73 NY2d 741, the Court of Appeals said that it was well established that "hearsay evidence can be the basis of an administrative determination. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
Furthermore, there can be no reasonable expectation of privacy once that person has been charged with a criminal offence; still less in respect of proceedings in open court (PNM v Times Newspapers Ltd [2019] AC 161, [2017] UKSC 49 (19 July 2017)). [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:28 pm
Gray (2014) 58 Cal.4th 901, 909 (Gray).) [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 1:54 pm by Joe Patrice
[BuzzFeed] * Today is also the anniversary of the argument in Loving v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 2:46 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Similar claims for damages to those made by the appellant were held to be irrecoverable by the House of Lords in Gray v Thames Trains Ltd [2009] UKHL 33 (“Gray”). [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:20 am by INFORRM
  This was struck out by Sir Charles Gray ([2009] EWHC 2863 (QB)) and the defendant sought permission to appeal. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 7:11 am
Now that the Supreme Court has placed a police video online in his decision today in Scott v. [read post]