Search for: "Green v. Superior Court" Results 241 - 260 of 530
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2014, 9:50 am by Alexis Domb
Iovate Health Sciences U.S.A., Inc., Case No. 1402915 ,filed with the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Barbara.) [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 10:59 am
“I think as a result of that, I got some interesting, complex cases and had some prominent lawyers appearing in front of me,” he says, citing the overtime, Tim Hortons franchise, and Green v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 6:32 am
’ Following a hearing, the trial court granted the motion to suppress, and the Commonwealth appealed to Superior Court.Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 8:50 am by Andrew Delaney
Supreme Court set up a procedure in Anders v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 7:30 am by Shea Denning
 The defendant in Geisslercrain appealed her district court conviction of impaired driving to superior court. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
  The Sustainable Economies Law Center maintains a legal resource library,  Co-opLaw.org in partnership with the Green Collar Communities Clinic (GC3). [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Messier, 2014 QCCS 357 (judgment in French) the Quebec Superior Court awarded Can$5,000 moral damages and Can$5,000 punitive damages in respect of defamatory allegations published on the internet. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 10:53 am by Shea Denning
The defendant in Geisslercrain appealed her district court conviction of impaired driving to superior court. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 5:41 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Among her many staggering incompetences, DC Superior Court judge Natalia Combs-Greene then denied NR’s motion to dismiss the fraudulent complaint while simultaneously permitting Mann’s lawyers to file an amended complaint. 4. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 12:08 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Williams-Sonoma * California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) * Ninth Circuit: FACTA Does not Cover Emailed Receipts — Simonoff v. [read post]