Search for: "HAIR v. STATE"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,764
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2020, 4:03 pm
IndiaYouTube, LLC v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 12:42 pm
Devane v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 12:30 pm
Also, a soft circuit-split: the Sixth Circuit breaks with the Eleventh in electing to spell Anderson v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 8:20 am
U.S. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 9:58 am
Maffick v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed that ruling, but last week, in Jones v. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 12:27 pm
Today, Lochner v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 10:00 am
Price v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 10:25 am
On August 12, 2020, the United States District Court in Studio 417, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 9:50 am
The Case This proposed class action was brought by Missouri hair salon company Studio 417 and four restaurant operators – Grand Street Dining, LLC, GSD Lenexa, LLC, Trezomare Operating Company and V’s Restaurant, Inc. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 8:59 am
Like this one.The case is Emamian v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:56 am
Cooper v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 11:06 am
., et al. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 9:02 am
Mayhew v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 7:34 am
Hopps, Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am
”[6] The court’s stated standard is much less interesting than its reasoning process, which goes 2020. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 10:25 am
This could be her elephantState v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 2:55 pm
Platforms are already incentivized to take down content on a hair trigger to avoid potential liability, and the Mexican law provides new penalties if they don’t. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
Take the currently registered trademark HAIR NO MORE for a "hair growth inhibiting spray mist and gel. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 4:22 am
Steve also stated that consumer education (e.g. [read post]
