Search for: "Handy v. State" Results 241 - 260 of 523
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2014, 7:56 am by Jamie Markham
Because you should always use the grid that was in place when the defendant committed his or her crime—and there’s no flexibility on that, by the way, State v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:19 pm
This in particular since  “the public retains only an imperfect memory of the marks registered in the Member States or of Community marks ... [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 12:06 am
Dieser kurze Beitrag untersucht, ob die Vereinigten Staaten durch das Abhören des Handys der Kanzlerin Regeln des Völkerrechts verletzt haben. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 5:50 am by Wells Bennett
Meade: a third day of CCTV-broadcasted proceedings in United  States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:19 pm
 He stated:  "The system of amending patents is an integral part of the patent system. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 12:20 pm by Trevor Timm
There is some good news: The government had also moved to stay First Unitarian Church v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 7:06 am by David Fraser
I previously blogged about the case here: Password protect your phone if you care about your privacy: What R v Fearon means Here is also a handy summary from the SCC: 35298 Kevin Fearon v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 10:22 am
[If you want some handy tips on how to speed-read all those comments, try the Wired How-To Wiki, here] In case you missed it, Eli Lilly and Company v Human Genome Sciences, Inc UKSC 2012/0220 is not going on appeal to the United Kingdom's Supreme Court. [read post]
25 May 2013, 10:16 am by Rick Hills
The slide suggests this basic truth with a blank white screen, followed by text in red stating that silence = prohibition. [read post]