Search for: "Homer v. Homer"
Results 241 - 260
of 400
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2012, 4:38 am
— from Wage and Hour Laws Blog Myles v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 6:37 pm
See Rawls v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:18 pm
And on this basis, you can understand it as of a piece with the other anti-war play, Henry V--just Henry V carried remorselessly to its logical conclusion.The Ashland Henry V is not exactly a top-of-the-chart presentation: good enough, but you could wish for better. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:18 pm
And on this basis, you can understand it as of a piece with the other anti-war play, Henry V--just Henry V carried remorselessly to its logical conclusion.The Ashland Henry V is not exactly a top-of-the-chart presentation: good enough, but you could wish for better. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
Potts v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 7:48 am
On 25 April 2012 the Supreme Court handed down two major judgments on age discrimination: Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2012] UKSC 15 and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes [2012] UKSC 16. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:05 am
In another decision heard at the same time, Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police, the Supreme Court considered whether an employer’s policy of restricting promotion to employees with a law degree was justified indirect age discrimination against an employee who didn’t have a law degree and didn’t have the time to obtain one before retirement. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:15 pm
Homer in Albany, New York. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:15 pm
Homer in Albany, New York. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 12:31 am
Indirect age discrimination An interesting blog post on the recent Supreme Court decision in Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police that persons in the position of Homer were disadvantaged because of a reason (retirement) that directly related to their age. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 3:05 am
Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and another v Homer; [2012] UKSC 15; [2012] WLR (D) 122 “An employment requirement which worked to the comparative disadvantage of a person approaching compulsory retirement age was indirectly discriminatory on grounds of age and had to be justified. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 2:01 am
Supreme Court Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2012] UKSC 15 (25 April 2012) Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership) [2012] UKSC 16 (25 April 2012) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) E, R v [2012] EWCA Crim 791 (25 April 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Swain Mason & Ors v Mills & Reeve (a firm) [2012] EWCA Civ 498 (23 April 2012) Brightsea UK Ltd v Drachs Investments No 3 Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 516 (25… [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 3:13 am
On appeal from: [2010] EWCA Civ 419. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:34 am
The following judgments will be handed down by the Supreme Court on Wednesday 25 April 2012: Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership). [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:50 am
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership), heard 17 – 20 January 2012. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:57 am
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership), heard 17 – 20 January 2012. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:31 am
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership), heard 17 – 20 January 2012. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 4:30 am
Island v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:26 am
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership), heard 17 – 20 January 2012. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:19 am
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership), heard 17 – 20 January 2012. [read post]
