Search for: "Howell v. United States"
Results 241 - 260
of 322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 12:05 pm
" PICCO, 411 U.S. at 674; United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
Bush appointee Judge Karen Henderson – put a temporary stay on Howell’s ruling. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 5:46 pm
Moreover, Hayes Lemmerz has 4.86 retirees receiving health insurance benefits for every active worker in the United States. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Reforming the Supreme Court of the United States, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 11:40 pm
And then in 1992, Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
Thus, in Howell, plaintiffs could not recover as past medical expenses amounts in excess of sums actually paid by or on behalf of the plaintiff. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 6:41 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 7:18 pm
Another brief, supporting a new trial, came jointly from the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), Public Knowledge, United States Internet Industry Association, and Computer & Communications Industry Association. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am
The second covers the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Pepper v. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am
The second covers the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Pepper v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 5:22 am
Alan Rozenshtein flagged a forthcoming article he wrote for the Yale Law Journal Forum arguing that the Supreme Court was wrong to conclude that the government needed a warrant to collect large quantities of cell-phone location data in United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 11:25 am
Circuit Opinion in Atchley v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 2:51 pm
Howell (2018). [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 10:59 pm
There are, however, two important caveats to this general rule: 1 – In nearly all cases, real property located in the United States in not like-kind to property located outside the United States. [read post]
Yawn: amicus briefs in support of Google's API copyright petition to the Supreme Court have surfaced
7 Nov 2014, 11:51 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States is concerned with proper interpretation of what Congress decides, and not with making policy judgments for Congress.I'm not going to discuss the frequently-cited SAS Institute v. [read post]
