Search for: "I D B Board"
Results 241 - 260
of 3,930
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2011, 5:11 pm
As Jack Siegel of Charity Governance pointed out, the Governance Checklist asks how often the voting board members met during the primary year under the examination (Question 11(a)) and how often the full board met (Questions 11(b)). [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:00 am
Supreme Court, Justice Louis D. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 11:48 am
William B. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 3:58 am
Well, your would-be honor, try your skills on these five recent appeals, keeping in mind that, by my estimate, about 85% of Section 2(d) refusals are affirmed by the Board. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 1:44 pm
I'd like to address the issue squarely and clearly in this blog, and I apologize in advance that for extreme clarity I am going to use "lawyer-ese" in this blog. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 10:55 am
I'd also strongly suggest having a look at the open source Security Incident Response Policy I posted here in 2007 - it goes well with these. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 8:31 am
I’d be grateful for any perspectives on that question. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 1:21 pm
B. [read post]
26 Nov 2006, 6:55 am
I saw an article in the Globe that I thought I'd bring to your attention. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 3:41 am
., Serial No. 97441814 (June 25, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cindy B. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 3:32 pm
The non-exhaustive list of ten factors—none of which is determinative—include: (a) The extent of control which, by the agreement, the master may exercise over the details of the work; (b) Whether or not the one employed is engaged in a distinct occupation or business; (c) The kind of occupation, with reference to whether, in the locality, the work is usually done under the direction of the employer or by a specialist without supervision; (d) The skill required in the… [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 3:38 am
Under Lexmark, the Board must assess "whether the party demonstrated (i) an interest falling within the zone of interests protected by the statute and (ii) proximate causation. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 4:40 pm
The Section's Board recently approved a schedule of meetings and programs that I'd like to share with you. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 3:15 am
The Board found that the phrase I LOVE YOU is "essentially the bracelet itself. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 1:13 am
A method for producing a B. oleracea plant comprising a monogenic and dominant resistance to clubroot comprising the steps of:a) obtaining a B. rapa plant resistant to clubroot comprising a monogenic and dominant resistance to clubroot;b) crossing said B. rapa plant with a B. oleracea plant,c) rescuing embryos resulting from the cross of step b);d) regenerating a plant from a embryo of step c);e) selecting a plant of step d)… [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 1:50 pm
§§ 41.125(c), 41.127(d), or 42.71(d); ii. a petition to the Chief Judge under 37 C.F.R. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 9:53 am
These new-style productions happen often enough that I infer it's a board mandate, not just a director's jeu d'esprit. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 4:50 am
"Balancing the relevant du Pont factors, the Board found confusion likely and it affirmed the Section 2(d) refusal.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: I suspect that you got this one right. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 9:30 am
” 20 CFR § 295.3(a)(1) The Railroad Retirement Board provides us with sample language for any order which I have included below. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
I would like to thank Andrew and Laura for submitting their article for publication as a guest post. [read post]
