Search for: "I v. B"
Results 241 - 260
of 24,601
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2013, 3:02 pm
§ 512(c)(3)(B)(i). [read post]
19 May 2008, 5:42 pm
I've recovering from a nasty cold, but the USSC issuing an opinion in US v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 10:52 pm
Related PostsDecember 9, 2009 -- A, B and C v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 8:17 am
Specifically, "While the majority's treatment of the Rule 404(b) issue is a welcome improvement on our circuit's law, I respectfully dissent from the finding that the serious Rule 404(b) error was harmless. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 1:18 pm
§ 271(b) where the jury (A) found the defendant had actual knowledge of the patent and (B) was instructed that “[i]nducing third-party infringement cannot occur unintentionally. [read post]
5 May 2015, 5:03 pm
(See, e.g., Friends of Oroville v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
On March 6th, Texas Supreme Court Chief Justice Wallace B. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 3:46 pm
The Army JAG then certified the following issues to CAAF: (I) Whether the military judge and the Army Court of Criminal Appeals erred in applying Michigan v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 11:21 am
§ 1227(a)(2)(B)(i) and inadmissible pursuant to 8 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 11:15 am
Related posts:Hall v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 9:02 am
§ 154(b), provides for the restoration of patent term in three circumstances: (i) an “A-Delay,” which awards PTA for delays arising from the USPTO’s failure to act by certain examination deadlines; (ii) a “B-Delay,” which awards PTA for an application pendency exceeding three years; and (iii) a “C-Delay,” which awards PTA for delays due to interferences, secrecy orders, and appeals. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 5:12 pm
I have today’s transcript from oral argument before the Supreme Court in Marx v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:30 pm
The granted issues are: I. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Dukes v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 7:20 pm
Argument analysis: Justices dubious of government's broad reading of False Claims ActDear readers: I commend to you the excellent analysis by Ronald Mann of SCOTUSblog of the oral argument held today at the Supreme Court in the case of Kellogg Brown and Root v. [read post]
2 Jun 2007, 7:10 am
In reviewing fraudulent transfer cases, including Judge Mullins' recent opinion in the IMA case, I noticed citations to an opinion in the case of Kipperman v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 3:13 am
McCabe said that "I started to walk into the basement and caught [my] right foot on short step landing. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 6:42 am
Here: Ysleta Cert Petition Question presented: Whether the Restoration Act provides the Pueblo with sovereign authority to regulate non-prohibited gaming activities on its lands (including bingo), as set forth in the plain language of Section 107(b), the Act’s legislative history, and this Court’s holding in California v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 7:07 am
A week ago, I posted an entry about a Maryland case in which the Court of Appeals of Maryland strained to find that a sergeant's testimony did not violate Maryland's counterpart to Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b), which provides that... [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:00 pm
Kappos Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) case (1:12cv574) (Exelixis II) that affirms the USPTO’s interpretation of 35 USC § 154(b)(1)(B)(i). [read post]
