Search for: "IN RE J.A." Results 241 - 260 of 381
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2013, 10:17 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
” See, e.g., J.A. 348 (claim 1); J.A. 351 (claim 22). [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:07 pm
(dissenting on other grounds) in Re Schwartz (1970), 10 D.L.R. (3d) 15 at 32 (Ont. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 5:32 pm
As Hollinrake J.A. points out in British Columbia (Assessor of Area No. 25 - Northwest/Prince Rupert) v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 4:00 am by Simon Fodden
A majority (Goudge J.A. dissenting) ordered that the quantum of punitive damages be reduced from $500,000 to $100,000. ♨ 3. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 12:32 pm
In this event, the legal burden reverts to the propounder.[43] As noted by Garson J.A. in York, the testamentary capacity test is set out in the leading English case: Banks v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 11:47 pm by Robert Tanha
At the re-trial in November 2011, the award of punitive damages was increased to $550,000.00 by the same trial judge who had heard the case at the first instance. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 8:48 am by William Innes
Linden J.A. in Folster was alive to this danger when he observed that the use of the term “commercial mainstream” might “… imply, incorrectly, that trade and commerce is somehow foreign to First Nations” (para. 14, note 27). [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 6:43 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
It relies on case law that, in its view, supports its argument that faulty workmanship is not an accident … It relies on Ryan J.A. [read post]