Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: A. W., A CHILD (MOTHER)"
Results 241 - 260
of 415
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2013, 10:24 am
It is an interesting example of procedural nuance and code interpretation and offered in its entirety below: On December 11, 2012, the Honorable Peter W. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm
Such an exchange of views should be useful not only for scholars and policy makers in China and India, but also for anyone interested in other BRICS countries as well: Brazil, Russia and South Africa. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 8:49 pm
The Jick study did not report a statistically significant outcome with respect to the limb reduction deficit, which was the outcome of interest for the Wells plaintiffs. [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 2:17 pm
" The mother was represented by Stephen W. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 11:04 am
Further, Mother was opposed to cultivating a relationship between the child and her Father. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 8:06 am
Second, Lozano contended that the district court erred in finding that the child was settled in New York despite the fact that neither the child nor her mother had legal status in the United States. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 7:19 am
On June 7, 2012, the Hospital declined to release K.W. to her mother, petitioner Claudia Felder, a Swiss resident, absent evidence such a release would comply with the child's treatment plan. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
Mother later gave birth, and Father had no relationship with the child. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 8:20 am
W. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 8:20 am
W. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 4:21 pm
The complainant no longer has any legally protected interests in continuing the proceedings before the Lucerne District Court. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 12:45 am
The case was also analysed by suesspiciousminds in his post referred to below.Re S (A Child) [2012] EWCA Civ 1031 (24 July 2012)Appeal by father against contact order and residence order in favour of mother, in case involving mother's relocation. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 7:27 pm
The dissents “[w]ith great respect for the majority” contested these findings, often with impolitic language, to wit: I believe it [the majority] has recast the facts to portray Father in an undeserved favorable light, thus creating the illusion that Father’s interests are in harmony with the best interests of the child. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:52 am
The second claimant, ‘KF’, is a mother who is due to be released on 9 August 2012 [3]. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:30 am
” [W]e find that a preponderance of the evidence supports the trial court’s determination that the best interest of the children was served by denying [Mother] the right to relocate the children. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:57 am
His mother, Lisa W., was the alleged victim on both counts. [read post]
10 May 2012, 12:33 pm
MARTIN W. [read post]
7 May 2012, 6:37 am
potential adoptive families for the child, and reversed the decision. [read post]
4 May 2012, 7:31 am
Agents spoke with defendant’s father, and tried to speak to defendant’s mother (Tr. 368–70), and agents continued to have contact with defendant’s family members as they returned various items of personal property that had been seized on September 14, 2009, during their first visit to the Medunjanin home. [read post]
1 May 2012, 10:01 pm
The father was reprsented by Kyle W. [read post]
