Search for: "In Re: Daniel et al"
Results 241 - 260
of 305
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
App. 1993)(laryngeal cancer) In re W.R. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 6:29 pm
” IARC Monograph for Carbon Black, Titanium Dioxide & Talc, vol 93 (2010); Robert Baan, et al., “Carcinogenicity of carbon black, titanium dioxide, and talc,” 7 Lancet Oncology 295 (2006)5. [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:29 pm
Compare In re Zoloft (Setraline Hydrochloride) Products, 26 F. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 8:03 pm
He is the co-author of a 2007 study critical of the impact of DTC advertising in orthopaedics (Bozic, K.J., Smith, A.R., Hariri, S., et al. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
Anyway, the now 32-year-old owner of the then-four-month-old penis depicted in the photo has sued Nirvana et al., alleging that the naked baby photo is child pornography. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:47 am
I am happy to announce the publication of "The Human Rights Obligations of Stet-Owned Enterprises: Emerging Conceptual Structure and Principles in National and International Law and Policy," which appears in the Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational law 50(4):827-888 (2017). [read post]
12 May 2017, 12:45 pm
I am happy to announce the publication of an article, "Shaping a Global Law for Business Enterprises: Framing Principles and the Promise of a Comprehensive Treaty on Business and Human Rights," that appears in the North Carolina Journal of International Law 42(2): 417-504 (2016).The introduction follows; comments and engagement always welcome. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
For the Balkinization symposium on David Pozen, The Constitution of the War on Drugs (Oxford University Press, 2024).Paul Butler Like most users of illegal drugs, I have never been caught. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(Inventive Step) (Patent Docs) US Patents Applying Supreme Court precedent: Carlsbad Technology v HIF Bio (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) USPTO not laying off employees (IP Watchdog) USPTO maintenance fees (Patently-O) Merchants warranty of non-infringement (Patently-O) PLI patent bar review tour (IP Watchdog) Provisional patent applications: waiting to file non-provisionals (Patently-O) 35 USC § 315(C) and its uncodified cousin – inter partes re-examination… [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 8:16 am
Feisal Al-Istrabadi, founding director of the Center for the Study of the Middle East; Amb. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 1:17 pm
Work in this tradition includes • Peyton-Jones & Eber (2001); • CL “Contract Language” (Schneider et al at Olso 2007); • CSL “Contract Specification Language” (Henglein and Hvitved at Copenhagen 2012); • LPS “Logic Production Systems” (Kowalski & Sadri at Imperial, 2017); • FCL “Formal Contract Language” (Farmer and Hu at McMaster 2018); • Symboleo (Daniel Amyot et al,… [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am
Landow Aviation LP, et al. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:03 am
Thompson, et al., “Enhancing the ecological risk assessment process,” 4 Integrated Envt’l Assess. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:26 am
Work in this tradition includes • Peyton-Jones & Eber (2001); • CL “Contract Language” (Schneider et al at Olso 2007); • CSL “Contract Specification Language” (Henglein and Hvitved at Copenhagen 2012); • LPS “Logic Production Systems” (Kowalski & Sadri at Imperial, 2017); • FCL “Formal Contract Language” (Farmer and Hu at McMaster 2018); • Symboleo (Daniel Amyot et al,… [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm
The Transparency Project has published a summary of Re B, R & G (a Child) [2022] EWHC 320 (Fam), in which the local authority was applying for reporting restrictions for the trial of G and E’s parents, who were charged with the murder of E. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016) I will be teaching a course on Corporate Social Responsibility. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 8:13 pm
Toyota Motor, et al. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Supp. 247 (1984), rev’d on other grounds, 816 F.2d 1417 (10th Cir. 1987) In re TMI Litig., 927 F. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
Supreme Court.[6] One influential re-articulation came in Wisconsin v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 11:26 am
Independent MP, Andrew Bridgen, has said he will sue the former Health Secretary, Matt Hancock, for £100,000 in defamation over a tweet in which Hancock accused him of spreading “antisemitic, anti-vax, anti-scientific conspiracy theories. [read post]
