Search for: "In Re: Does v." Results 241 - 260 of 30,502
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2009, 2:32 pm
They're even more interesting when you've got to deal with them on the same judicial procedural terms that you use with "regular" nations, since the underlying doctrines don't always make sense as applied to these special cases. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 3:16 pm by Alisha Parmar
  The question then becomes whether a reasonable person in the employee’s position would have accepted the employer’s offer of re-employment.[1]  In Fredrickson v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 10:56 am
The IPKat has been pondering the Court of Appeal judgment in Tate &Lyle Technology Ltd v Roquette Frères [2010] EWCA Civ 1049 for a little while now, after noticing it issuing last week. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 7:53 am by Larry
Read more about that here.This does not often happen. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:17 pm
  In Re: Tableware Antitrust Litigation (No. 04-3514 VRW, N.D. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 11:37 am
Or, to put it as Judge Consuelo Marshall does (sitting by designation), if you're "an opinionated and arrogant" host of a radio show, you're harder to sue for defamation than someone who's actually reasonable.To put it another way, the more you defame everyone, the harder it is for any particular person to sue you for defamation. [read post]