Search for: "In Re Amendments to Rules of Civil Procedure"
Results 241 - 260
of 2,322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2011, 11:06 am
The Court while examining the relevant provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has culled out the principles for invoking the inherent powers of the Court. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
The clients brought their complaints under a variety of different legal theories, including the civil barratry statute (before it was amended to also authorize an award of statutory damages). [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 9:36 pm
In re Referendum on the Religious Freedom and Civil Marriage Equality Amendment Act of 2009, (DCBOEE, Feb. 4, 2010). [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 6:01 am
And because the contempt order was overturned on procedural grounds, the appellate court majority didn’t reach the husband’s First Amendment’s objections. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 3:50 am
If the appeal is dismissed, may the applicant file a civil action for review of the underlying requirement? [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 3:30 am
In May, when City residents go to the polls, they will decide whether to amend the Home Rule Charter to require this annual training. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 3:30 am
In May, when City residents go to the polls, they will decide whether to amend the Home Rule Charter to require this annual training. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 11:31 am
If you think that some civil liability rule is unconstitutional, you can challenge it—but only as a defense when you're sued, not through a preenforcement challenge. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 1:22 am
Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2858, at 176-80 (1973 & Supp.1982); 1 ALR Fed. 771 (1969 & Supp.1981); Note, Federal Rule 60(b): Finality of Civil Judgments v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 4:05 pm
No one shall be deprived of his liberty except on such grounds and in accordance with such procedure as are established by law. [read post]
A New Milestone: Appeals Court to Consider NSA's Mass Seizures and Searches on the Internet Backbone
4 Aug 2015, 3:10 pm
It’s more than time for a court to rule that this violates the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 6:51 pm
" But the federal gun ban against persons subject to a domestic violence protection order relies on lenient civil procedures, not strict criminal procedures, and thus facially violates the Second Amendment. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 5:14 pm
” The Act does not, the Tribunal noted, require that all significant issues must be common issues, nor indeed (by contrast to the requirement in the U.S. under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure) that common issues should predominate over individual issues. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 8:25 am
Ut res magis valeat quam pereat. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 9:10 am
Freelancer argues that “this generic, nonspecific language fails to meet the pleading standard set forth by Twombly, Iqbal, and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 1:17 pm
Rule 2-231(h) consistently with the interpretation by federal courts of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e), which requires that a reviewing court approve class action settlements that it finds are "fair, adequate and reasonable. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 6:42 am
Res. 90). [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 2:18 pm
” Again, such rules may not be viewed as procedural by federal courts in some contexts: For instance, in deciding whether to apply state or federal rules in civil “diversity” cases — i.e., cases under state law that come to federal court because the parties are citizens of different states — federal courts ask whether a particular rule is “substantive”; and they have treated burden-of-proof rules as… [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
The below review of the applicable state and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure confirms that a witness can indeed change the substance of their deposition testimony through the use of a post-deposition errata sheet. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:00 am
Direct TV and TWC each moved to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), asserting the complaint, as filed, lacked sufficient factual specificity to state a cause of action for direct patent infringement. [read post]
