Search for: "In Re Miller's Application"
Results 241 - 260
of 948
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2023, 6:04 am
” “Last month, the IDA reversed itself and replaced Nixon Peabody as transaction counsel for the CAT application with a new firm, Phillips Lytle. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 6:57 am
Miller are briefed by TIGTA; Shulman steps down at the end of his term and is replaced by Miller. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 9:53 pm
On January 22, 2019, Petitioner filed a Request for Return Application under the Hague Convention with the Central Authority for Spain. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 2:10 pm
If you have questions or are not sure if these changes affect you or your business, please contact Kean Miller attorneys, Jaye Calhoun (504.293.5936), Jill Gautreaux (504.620.3366) or Willie Kolarik (225.620.3197). [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:00 pm
Alan Horowitz is a member of Miller & Chevalier Chartered, where he heads the Supreme Court and Appellate Practice Group. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 4:55 pm
Miller v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 11:43 am
The repeal was effective December 1, 1998, and applicable to offenses committed on or after that date. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 4:56 am
We’re super excited, but are stuck on what to name her. [read post]
19 May 2016, 11:43 am
The repeal was effective December 1, 1998, and applicable to offenses committed on or after that date. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:15 am
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Every application is re- viewed first by an admissions office reader, who assigns a numerical rating to each of several categories. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Every application is re- viewed first by an admissions office reader, who assigns a numerical rating to each of several categories. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 10:57 am
Miller, 906 F.2d 1574, 15 USPQ2d 1333, 1336 (CAFC 1990) and Vas-Cath, 935 F.2d 1555Harold Wegner wrote:The result of Steenbock [In re Steenbock, 83 F.2d 912 (CCPA 1936)] is considered unfair to some. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 2:00 am
(This is especially relevant in an economy where many applicants do not accept job offers because they have so many choices.) [read post]
23 Dec 2017, 9:25 am
This restriction was imported into the Lanham Act in 1946 and withstood a constitutional challenge in the 1981 case In re McGinley where the government successfully argued a refusal to register a mark does not implicate an applicant’s First Amendment rights because the applicant can still use the mark as he or she pleases, just without federal trademark protection. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 4:51 am
TTAB Affirms Refusal of PLAQUE-ZAPPER for Pet Treats Due to Faulty Specimen of UsePrecedential No. 6: Applicant's Rule 133 Amendment Yields Dismissal of 2(d) OppositionRead comments and post your comment hereText Copyright John L. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:29 am
Jan. 30, 2008); Miller v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 9:13 am
In this case, the trademark application was for SIMMONS COMICS GROUP, who was selling comic books. [read post]
11 May 2020, 2:00 am
Take a stance, and position learning as a core skill for applicants and a company value. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 8:52 am
Shockingly, I find myself in agreement with State Senate President Mike Miller (which just makes me shudder): The freeze on state university tuition - which Gov. [read post]
