Search for: "In Re Opinion of the Justices."
Results 241 - 260
of 14,073
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2007, 11:52 am
In Re Daniel B. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 9:30 pm
[We have the following announcement of In re Judith Miller: National Security and the Reporter’s Privilege, sponsored by the D.C. [read post]
26 May 2021, 6:18 am
On 12 May 2021, Advocate General Hogan issued his opinion in the first case by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) considering the Blocking Regulation. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 7:42 pm
Last week I taught Justice Traynor's opinion in Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 3:28 pm
They visit the child all the time when they're allowed to do so. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:15 pm
The Justices well may find the case more difficult when they come to drafting the opinion, but if the argument is any indication, this case looks like a strong candidate for a unanimous opinion, handed down in short order. [read post]
22 May 2013, 1:20 pm
Department of Justice (DOJ) filed an amicus curiae brief in the matter of Florida Board of Bar Examiners Re: Question as to Whether Undocumented Immigrants are Eligible for Admission to the Florida Bar (SC11-2568). [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 4:39 pm
"You're like a little kid. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 5:17 pm
If you’re interested, here’s the Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel’s opinion titled, “The Department of Homeland Security’s Authority to Prioritize Removal of Certain Aliens Unlawfully Present in the United States and to Defer Removal of Others”, released yesterday. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 5:26 am
I imagined that the Court could write a "Christmas tree of an opinion" with something for everyone except Justice Alito--who would consider anything other than full-scale Gilead to be the equivalent of a lump of coal.Yesterday's unanimous opinion by Justice Kavanaugh mostly vindicates my assessment. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 3:54 pm
(In re Milton (2019) 42 Cal.App.5th 977, 982)So there's (1) a split in the panel opinion, (2) and a split in the various Court of Appeal holdings, (3) on an issue that's present in a boatload of cases.There's exactly a zero chance that the California Supreme Court doesn't grant review. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 7:58 am
Finally, the essay evaluates Justice Kennedy’s conceptions of gender in his opinions and votes. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 12:55 pm
The court ruled [opinion, JURIST report] in a 4-3 decision last month that the Budget Repair Bill [text, PDF] was not passed in violation of the "open meetings" rule [text], but plaintiffs asked that the case be re-opened because Justice Michael Gableman should have recused himself after failing... [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 1:10 pm
Justice Bigelow is right. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:45 pm
Before his appointment to the Supreme Court, Justice Alito has a judge on the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 6:06 am
Part 1: What we’re up against Part 2: Justice system down Part 3: Justice reconstructed Part 4: Lawyer formation disrupted Part 5 Lawyer formation rescued Part 6: Lawyer formation re-engineered Part 7: Law firm essentials Part 8: Law firm transitions Someone asked me the other day my opinion on where the pandemic is taking the legal profession, given my status as a […] The post Pandemic IX: Law firm… [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 6:02 pm
In re Guardianship of Doe, No. 28139, Oct. 31, 2008. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:09 am
Now that I have the benefit of a long time's reflection about, and critical distance from, Thursday's decision (insert appropriate emoticon here, to signal that I'm aware of the funny-absurdity of four days being a "long time" in blog-world), a few thoughts about the ACA cases, and the Chief Justice's opinion in particular, are starting to come together. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 6:47 am
The only way the voters and the so-called "principled justices" could share the same opinion of the Chief Justice's "strange views" would be if the "principled justices" were thinking in political terms — in which case, they would be no more principled than the Chief Justice.But if Tom Cotton is reading this — hi, Tom! [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 7:34 pm
The signs of a problem: 1) elected judges being forced to raise campaign funds to be re-elected; 2) state initiatives to punish judges for their decisions (citing South Dakota and Colorado); and 3) a disturbing trend in public opinion polls suggesting that more Americans believe judges make decisions, not based on what the law says, but what they personally want to do.Read his entire post here. [read post]
