Search for: "In Re Related Asbestos Cases"
Results 241 - 260
of 455
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
By the time the SCOTUS decided the case in 2011, both Smith and Pierce were dead, and their respective estates were carrying on the fight. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 8:22 pm
All of the attempts to re-define their claims were unsuccessful. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
PLAC has briefed expert issues involving benzene in New York, Doritos in Pennsylvania, and asbestos in a lot of places. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
Insurance payouts for asbestos-related litigation totaled $70 billion as of 2002, according to one study. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 2:57 am
This case concerns mesothelioma and the applicability of the Asbestos Industry Regulations 193, Reg 2(a) to factories not engaged in the manufacture of asbestos products but making lagging paste for insulation in a power station, and whether the appellant was in breach of a statutory duty owed to the respondent under the Factories Act 1937, s 47 because a substantial quantity of asbestos dust had been present when the respondent worked as a lorry driver collecting… [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 6:53 am
Lance is another example of the disturbing trend in post-Levine cases for plaintiffs to push for – and, worse, for courts to allow – “design” related claims against prescription drugs that are really frontal assaults on FDA drug approval decisions. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 9:22 am
See, e.g., In re Agent Orange Product Liab. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am
This was the first case in which a cancer of the colon was established as compensable and it is likely that this case will become an historical precedent. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:08 am
See, e.g., In re Agent Orange Product Liab. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 1:03 pm
In re Silicone Gel Breast Implant Prods. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 3:44 pm
”CTE Claims May Be Different Some of the attorneys for the former players argue that CTE diagnoses are more like “asbestos-related claims because it takes years for symptoms to surface. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
Now silicosis, you’re a dirty robber and a thief.Awww silicosis, dirty robber and a thief.Robbed me of my right to live and all you brought poor me was grief. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 11:37 am
The case is Farmers Mut. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am
There was a defamation case that will get media attention. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm
” The court characterized the referenced advice as relating to public relations advice, not legal counsel. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:23 am
They have discovered and built a perpetual motion machine — the asbestos litigation. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm
With today's holding, this Court intends to clarify the confusion and quell the consternation related to waiver under Rule 1925(b) and the number of issues raised. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 5:34 am
Id. at *5.Now on to why we’re posting about Lamere. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:00 am
Macreath was represented at the Court of Session by Edinburgh law firm Simpson & Marwick, one of whose partners told MSPs at the Scottish Parliament HERE that ‘asbestos is good for you’. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:12 am
During inspections conducted in 2011, EPA inspectors discovered numerous violations, from failing to inspect facilities for asbestos containing materials, failing to re-inspect campuses with known asbestos containing materials, and failing to have an Asbestos Management Plan. [read post]
