Search for: "In Re U.S. Grand Jury Subpoena"
Results 241 - 260
of 393
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2014, 10:20 am
Courts of Appeals Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/2014cta.htmlIn re Grand Jury Proceedings (tribal sovereign immunity, subpoena) Klamath Claims Committee v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:35 am
Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27 (2000) and lower court cases like In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 383 F.3d 905 (9th Cir.2004); U.S. v.... [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:48 am
As the majority admits: To be sure, the case law regarding civil discovery, grand jury subpoenas, and administrative subpoenas shows that relevance is interpreted broadly, and that incidental production of unrelated materials is accepted as essential to enable fulsome investigative efforts. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:20 pm
We’re at a law school, so it’s appropriate to talk about the “theory of the case. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm
Each development makes it more and more plausible that Judge Wright's referral of Prenda's principals to federal prosecutors will yield a grand jury investigation and, eventually, federal criminal charges. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:00 am
The second is that when collection takes place overseas, “the assumption is you’re not a U.S. person”, i.e. an American or green card holder. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 12:08 pm
Similarly, in re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that decryption and production of a hard drive's content triggered the protection of the Fifth Amendment because it would be testimonial. 670 F.3d 1335 (11th Cir. 2012). [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 3:49 am
U.S. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:00 am
If we indulge the assumption that the investigation is tied to some grand jury inquiry (likely in most, though not all scenarios) then resistance to a valid subpoena is quite hard. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm
If the communication is made to the attorney in her capacity as a business adviser, for example, it ought not be privileged”); In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 599 F.2d 504, 511 (2d Cir. 1979) (“Participation of the general counsel does not automatically cloak the investigation with legal garb”). [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:30 am
Last year, in In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum,670 F.3d 1335 (U.S. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 10:31 am
Judge Levario dismissed the mortgage fraud indictment against Hill III this week after Craig Watkins declined to take the stand in her court and give sworn testimony on his decision to seek an indictment against Hill from the Dallas grand jury. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 8:22 am
But when the Jihadis walked right through “law enforcement” and blew up downtown that bright fall day, they blew up much of what the remained debatable in the debate about privacy and technology — or, at least, so it seemed, until a year ago, when the 11th Circuit issued an important ruling in In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, summarized here by Joel Hruska: [A] John Doe . . . was compelled to testify before a… [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 9:32 am
Lamberth, In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 846 F.Supp.2d 1 (D.D.C. 2012) - Ojetta R. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 5:59 am
He also faces an obstruction of justice charge for allegedly producing altered computerized accounting records after receiving a grand jury subpoena. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 9:54 am
The full citation is In re: Grand Jury Subpoena, No. 11-20750 (5th Cir. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 9:14 am
Ed. 2d 1021 (1990); In re Grand Jury Subpoenas, 89-3 & 89-4, John Doe 89-129, 902 F.2d 244, 249 (4th Cir. 1990) (acknowledging that the attorney-client privilege extends to “potential co-parties to prospective litigation” when the attorney is involved in the communications). [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 8:52 am
The full citation is In re: Special February 2011-1 Grand Jury Subpoena Dated September 12, 2011, No. 1:11-gj-00792-1 (7th Cir. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 6:19 am
Jack Townsend, Seventh Circuit Compels Production of Offshore Bank Under the Required Records Doctrine: The Seventh Circuit today decided In Re: Special February 2011-1 Grand Jury Subpoena Dated September 12, 2011, here, holding that the required records doctrine requires a taxpayer asserting a Fifth Amendment privilege to produce the documents required to be maintained under the FBAR statute. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 8:34 am
A federal grand jury is now involved. [read post]
