Search for: "In Re Wright Industries" Results 241 - 260 of 311
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2014, 6:41 am by Schachtman
  Problematically, however, when the authors discuss some specific instances of apparent conflicts, they note industry “ties,” of the authors of an opinion piece on endocrine disruptors[3], but they are insensate to the ties of critics, such as David Ozonoff and Carl Cranor, to the litigation industry, a [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm by Bill Marler
“People who are commissioning these audits don’t seem to understand that they are … not worth the paper that they’re written on[5]. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 3:30 am by Dennis Dimka
They’re so confident in their reviews that they link to them above the fold. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 5:21 pm
On February 27, 2001, the Supreme Court handed down Whitman v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:29 am
Ten days ago, very few people had heard of the Reverend Wright's stuff, for example. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm by Ron Miller
The economy is changing rapidly because of technology, automation, and artificial intelligence that is shaping many industries, from manufacturing to healthcare to retail. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:43 am by Bernard Bell
  See In Re Sponsorship Identification Requirements for Foreign Government-Provided Programming, Report and Order, FCC 21-42 (April 22, 2021)(adding subsection (j) to 47 C.F.R. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 6:05 am by Hal Scott, Harvard Law School,
Editor’s Note: Hal Scott is the Director of the Program on International Financial Systems at Harvard Law School. [read post]
18 Sep 2006, 8:40 am
Employing patents as a proxy for innovation, we find support for the real as well as the financial implications of the model: (1) Technologically innovative industries exhibit greater intensity of patent creation and patent citation relative to other industries in countries with weaker creditor rights; (2) This difference of difference result is further confirmed by within-country analysis that exploits time-series changes in creditor rights, suggesting a causal effect of… [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 10:06 am by Roshonda Scipio
(RES) TZ 2 SP33 2011 Civil Rights With all deliberate speed : implementing Brown v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 3:11 pm
Others provided a more nuanced though cautious reaction (Thomas Wright, The National Security Strategy Papers Over a Crisis, The Atlantic (19 Dec. 2017) ("It tries to convert the mundane into the language of nationalism, presumably playing to an audience of one. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:38 am by frank_bennett
We’ll begin with the following sample citation in the OSCOLA style: Jones & others v Wright [1991] 3 All ER 88. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:44 pm by Patrick S. O'Donnell
’Wallace was never told that the day before he died a grand jury in West Feliciana Parish, north of Baton Rouge, had re-indicted him in the prison guard’s death. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 3:30 pm by Elina Saxena
More than two months after the American attack on the Médecins Sans Frontières facility in Kunduz, two servicemen “told Congress that American special forces called in an air strike on a hospital in Afghanistan because they believed the Taliban were using it as a command center. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:35 am
(Recall that in Curtiss-Wright the President could choose whether to ban arms sales to the Chaco, and in Loving he could decide whether a particular offense was death-eligible, even though the Court assumed in both cases that he would have no power to do this on his own.) [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
Medical Device: MEDICAL DEVICE SUPPLIER ISN'T 'HEALTH CARE PROVIDER', Orthopedic Res. v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
Sources, including law enforcement officials and industry investigators, said the data has been used to hack victim accounts and extort women and minors, sometimes for sexually explicit material, Bloomberg reports. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am by INFORRM
The Canadian journalism industry has asked parliamentarians to pass an Australian-style law forcing Google and Meta to pay for news by the end of June, the Press Gazette reports. [read post]