Search for: "In re: Asbesto Products"
Results 241 - 260
of 542
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2014, 11:00 am
See, e.g., In re Silica Products Liab. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd., 1986 WL 69060, at *5-6 (N.D. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
Take for example, asbestosis, a diffuse interstitial lung disease caused by chronic, excessive inhalation of asbestos. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 10:36 am
In In re Fibreboard Corp., 893 F. 2d 706, 711-12 (5th Cir. 1990), the court rejected a class action approach to litigating asbestos personal injury claims because risk could not substitute for findings of individual causation: “That procedure cannot focus upon such issues as individual causation, but ultimately must accept general causation as sufficient, contrary to Texas law. [read post]
29 May 2014, 8:45 am
The defendants, consist of an asbestos air monitoring company, five of its employees, and an employee of an asbestos abatement contractor, were convicted, collectively. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 7:43 am
These provisions usually involve you agreeing not to use the information that you learned about the company, its products, and how it is run confidential. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 2:11 pm
Fibreboard Corp., 527 U.S. 815 (1999), and Amchem Products, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 8:22 pm
All of the attempts to re-define their claims were unsuccessful. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 3:28 am
The Wall Street Journal ran a story, entitled, Chinese Asbestos in Australia? [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
PLAC has briefed expert issues involving benzene in New York, Doritos in Pennsylvania, and asbestos in a lot of places. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:16 am
” Berkshire’s promises, Buffett states, “have no equal,” a fact that has been “affirmed in recent years by the actions of some of the world’s largest and most sophisticated insurers,” who have sought to “cede” liabilities, particularly those involving asbestos claims. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
In re Garlock Sealing Techs., No. 10-31607, order (Bankr. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 2:57 am
This case concerns mesothelioma and the applicability of the Asbestos Industry Regulations 193, Reg 2(a) to factories not engaged in the manufacture of asbestos products but making lagging paste for insulation in a power station, and whether the appellant was in breach of a statutory duty owed to the respondent under the Factories Act 1937, s 47 because a substantial quantity of asbestos dust had been present when the respondent worked as a lorry driver collecting… [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 6:53 am
” How about a claim that a product is just too dangerous and should either never have been sold or should not be sold any longer? [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 9:22 am
See, e.g., In re Agent Orange Product Liab. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am
Selikoff, back in 1954, as an expert witness in the “original 17” UNARCO (Union Asbestos and Rubber Co.) asbestos worker claims. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:08 am
See, e.g., In re Agent Orange Product Liab. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 12:15 pm
”While there are still plenty of great excuses for going “old-school” in trial (see Why You Should NOT Use Technology in Your Trial), if you’re inclined to win one now and then, it could be time to reevaluate. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 1:57 am
Todays' post is shared from the NYimes.org Re “The Asbestos Scam,” by Joe Nocera (column, Dec. 3): Asbestos manufacturers filed for bankruptcy after juries across the nation assessed punitive damages for concealing the asbestos-disease hazards from their workers and the users of their products for 50 years. [read post]
30 Nov 2013, 2:42 pm
Texas product liability firm Hissey Kientz LLP added content on mesh contraction to its transvaginal mesh website, added a frequently asked questions page to its BioMet website, updated the news stories on its Granuflo website and added new content on the hazards of asbestos exposure to its Mesothelioma website. [read post]
