Search for: "In re Billings (1990)" Results 241 - 260 of 1,231
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
 The Intellectual Property Laws Amendment Bill 2014 was introduced in the House of Representatives on 19 March 2014. [read post]
25 May 2018, 10:03 am by Scott R. Anderson
Once enacted, the Merkley bill would repeal the 2002 AUMF immediately but leave the 2001 AUMF in place for six months. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 4:44 am by SHG
But let’s make sure we’re looking in the right place and aiming at the right actors. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Americans continue to believe they're overtaxed and that the middle class shoulders a disproportionate share of the tax load. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 1:31 am by Frank Cranmer
Plus a further ten Bills that did not become Acts. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 8:13 am by Mark Herrmann
[I]n the [decade omitted] we’re going to see straight hourly billing die. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 11:24 am by Udi Ofer
 Compared to past DNC platforms, this year’s proposed platform represents a dramatic shift from the 1990s. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 6:42 pm
They're people who became wildly rich as Goldman Sachs led the way in staking the nation's economic health on those reckless instruments. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 10:33 pm
” … Tainted sprouts have caused at least 39 illness outbreaks since 1990, according to Bill Marler, a Seattle-based product liability attorney. [read post]
5 May 2008, 6:00 am
(See also In re Marriage of Arceneaux (1990) 51 Cal.3d 1130, 1133 ['[a] judgment or order of a lower court is presumed to be correct on appeal, and all intendments and presumptions are indulged in favor of its correctness'].) [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:09 pm by Mary Anne Peck
” It’s this sort of murky legal ethics that the backers of the Florida bills say they’re trying to combat. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
  If a party wanted the court to adopt the exception, it appears that an argument similar to the one adopted in the California Court of Appeals case, In re Santos Y.[22] could be used. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 8:20 am by Jeff Gamso
 For them, for Bill Otis and Nancy Grace and the rest, it's about, well, there's no stopping point. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 11:00 am by Marsha Tesar
Unpack that: a parent buys stock in 1990 and then leaves it to their heirs in 2014. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:50 am by Marty Lederman
  Several changes were made to the bill during the Judiciary Committee markup in late September of 1992 and prior to the bill’s introduction in 103rd Congress. [read post]