Search for: "In re David B." Results 241 - 260 of 2,528
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2012, 10:53 am by David Lat
Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Career Services, Chief Judge David Sentelle, Clerks, Clerkship Scramble, Clerkships, David B. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 11:34 pm by Jeff Gamso
  It's that however bloodthirsty we may be individually, or at least however bloodthirsty some individuals are, as a society we think we're better than that.So we're not willing (that "we" is, again, the societal one) to wallow in what we're doing. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 10:11 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Fifth Generation Computer, represented by DAVID B. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 1:58 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  Understanding when you must pay employees when they’re on the move might help you avoid a train wreck down the road (pun intended.) [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 2:25 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  On 30 June 2010, AFCCA denied a pro se habeas petition filed by 2d Lt David A Valois, in this decision. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 5:00 am by Gerry Riskin
“If you’re a lawyer,” they write, “and you think you don’t need to worry about blockchain, think again. [read post]
12 Jul 2008, 3:03 pm
David's father died, and David received his inheritance during his marriage to Mechelle. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:43 am
February 5, 2007Re: The Preternaturally Prolific Posner on Plagiarism.From: Dean Lawrence R. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 11:23 pm by Kevin O'Keefe
Image courtesy of Flickr by Kristina B [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 9:02 am
(A) Buying a $6,000 shower curtain (B) Throwing your (much younger) wife a $2 million birthday party in Sardinia (C) Having your company buy you an $18 million Fifth Avenue apartment (D) Earning as much as $170 million in a single year (E) None of the above If you answered (E), you’re correct. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 7:52 pm by Dennis Crouch
by David Boundy Many patent attorneys—including me—went through law school thinking “Administrative law? [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 1:44 am by Ted Frank
§ 2072(b), and its provision that judicially-created procedural rules "shall not abridge, enlarge or modify any substantive right. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 9:50 am
The IPKat gets to grips with the new draft of the Guidelines These Guidelines are a comprehensive re-write. [read post]