Search for: "In re David G."
Results 241 - 260
of 1,039
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2019, 9:52 am
The simplistic binaries that frame conversations of Palestinian armed struggle evoke the condescension expressed by colonial overloads toward the resistance of indigenous peoples. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 9:00 pm
Later, in May 2017, STF ruled unconstitutional Article 1,790 of the Brazilian Civil Code in Extraordinary Appeals (REs nº 646721 and nº 878694). [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 1:58 pm
The first person to acknowledge here is my London partner David Lethem, who reports the following from the United Kingdom: “Restoration of an application (Section 20A), restoration of a claim to priority (Section 5(2)) and restoration of a lapsed patent due to non-payment of a renewal fee (Section 28) all share the same hurdle that the failure leading to loss was “unintentional”. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:00 am
Still, it should be chastening for Calabresi that we're not even in the top 20 and described as a "flawed democracy. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Take Payday Lenders and Arbitration as a Textbook Case: What is the Majority Position on Litigation Waiver and Who Got It Right? [read post]
19 May 2019, 9:30 pm
David Lilienthal, the Frankfurter protégé quoted above, said the question involved “a complex set of facts [calling] for the exercise of administrative and business judgment of the highest order. [read post]
16 May 2019, 12:25 pm
For more information on how to obtain an Order for Assistance, please contact David A.S. [read post]
15 May 2019, 7:21 pm
I am delighted to announce the publication of "Next Generation Law: Data-Driven Governance and Accountability Based Regulatory Systems in the West, and Social Credit Regimes in China," Law &: Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 28(1): 123-172 (2018).In the contemporary world, compliance systems and policing are quickly replacing law and the traditional methods of enforcement (either organic or positive law) as the framework through which collectives (the state, the… [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am
The following is a series of questions prompted by the forthcoming publication of Michael Bobelian’s “Battle for the Marble Palace: Abe Fortas, Earl Warren, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, and the Forging of the Modern Supreme Court” (Schaffner Press, 2019). [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 4:49 pm
We’re on the side of what’s right and what is just. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 8:05 am
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Sara Cortes and David P. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:40 pm
Wertsch, the David R. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm
The government maintained that it relies on RMC 701(g)(2), which states “the defense shall notify the trial counsel before the beginning of trial on the merits of its intent to ... introduce expert testimony as to the accused mental condition. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 12:09 pm
Kimball, David B. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 5:50 pm
Lawrence J. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 6:04 am
Jennifer G. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 8:50 pm
Kent G. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am
In In re Marriage of Suggs, the Washington Supreme Court set aside a civil harassment restraining order that barred "knowingly and willfully making invalid and unsubstantiated allegations or complaints to third parties which are designed for the purpose of annoying, harassing, vexing, or otherwise harming [plaintiff] and for no lawful purpose. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
”[71] Justice Arbour noted that, in explaining the standard to a jury, it might be preferable to re-word the standard of causation using positive terms, for example, a phrase such as a “‘significant contributing cause’ rather than using expressions phrased in the negative such as ‘not a trivial cause’ or ‘not insignificant’. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 8:06 pm
” David G. [read post]
