Search for: "In re Tobacco Cases II" Results 241 - 260 of 342
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2007, 10:24 am
Being experienced in the public eye, including in Washington in some cases, they had to know that the best thing to do, especially when one is a big deal of high reputation, is to say nothing more and let the whole thing blow over and die, as most often occurs and as occurred for four of the five miscreants. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 4:01 am by Michael J. Hassen
The Court also explained that the California Supreme Court opinion in In re Tobacco II Cases, 46 Cal.4th 298 (Cal. 2009), did not compel a different result. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am by Kelly
Kubus (EPLAW) Nigeria Slow news day: Relocation of the Trademarks Registry in Nigeria (Afro-IP) Puerto Rico Puerto Rico gears up for university-originated R&D exploitation reforms (IP tango) Poland Cold Case: SOLERO trademark case (Class 46) The protection of economic turnover – CHOLESTIN (Class 46) Well known trademarks (Class 46) South Africa SACTWU warns that factories may close due to counterfeiting (Afro-IP) I put it on a shirt first, Swaziboy–Swazi Boy… [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 5:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In re iPhone 4S Consumer Litigation, 2013 WL 3829653, (N.D. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  McAdams resulted in one of the nine published post-Tobacco II appellate opinions, in which the Court of Appeal reversed the trial court's order denying class certification. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 1:01 am by CMS
In particular, does it relate to: (i) the Union of the Kingdoms of Scotland and England; and/or (ii) the Parliament of the United Kingdom? [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 2:59 pm by Daniel Gilman
Haase, was filed in 1939 and decided in 1941 (one of two decided during World War II). [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 7:52 am by Peter Breslauer
In re Hyundai and Kia Fuel Economy Litig., No. 15-56014, 2018 WL 505343 (9th Cir. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 5:33 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
  He went on to discuss his work in the Katrina cases (In Re: Katrina Canal Breaches Consolidated Litigation) where plaintiffs’ attorneys waived their fees but were allowed to ask for an enhancement of costs. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
A bunch of courts also view Campbell as killing off punitive damages class actions: In re Simon II Litigation, 407 F.3d 125, 139 (2d Cir. 2005) (Campbell mandates decertification of punitive damages class); Johnson v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
“Labels Matter”: Emerging Trends in UCL, FAL, and CLRA False Advertising Litigation This panel will focus on the impact of recent California Supreme Court and appellate court decisions – including Kwikset, In re Tobacco II, Daugherty v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
., 402 F.Supp.2d 1133, 1137-39 (C.D.Cal.2005) (declining to read a reliance requirement into the UCL); In re Tobacco II Cases, 146 P.3d 1250 (2006) (granting petition for review on issue of whether UCL requires reliance); Def.'s Opp'n n. 5; Pl.'s Reply n. 7. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 1:23 pm by Russell Jackson
  Citing their earlier decision in In re Tobacco II Cases, the Kwikset Court reiterated that a UCL plaintiff relying on the fraud prong of the statute "must demonstrate actual reliance on the allegedly deceptive or misleading statements. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 1:23 pm by Russell Jackson
  Citing their earlier decision in In re Tobacco II Cases, the Kwikset Court reiterated that a UCL plaintiff relying on the fraud prong of the statute "must demonstrate actual reliance on the allegedly deceptive or misleading statements. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 3:09 am by John L. Welch
The Board concluded that "(i) persons who speak Spanish at home, and (ii) persons who do not speak Spanish at home but who know Spanish, are a substantial portion of the U.S. population. [read post]