Search for: "Insurance Federation of Pa. v. Supreme Court of Pa."
Results 241 - 260
of 338
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
HrynewOn August 22, 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada agreed to hear an appeal from the Alberta Court of Appeal’s decision in Bhasin v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Pa. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
The Delaware Supreme Court[1] and federal courts in Florida,[2] New York,[3] Illinois[4] and Georgia[5] have made the BJR available to officers. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
The defendant was sentenced in federal court on October 31, 2014, to seven years= imprisonment and ordered to pay restitution in the sum of $1,125,022.58.After trial Supreme Court, inter alia, found that in all respects the defendant was not credible. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
The defendant was sentenced in federal court on October 31, 2014, to seven years= imprisonment and ordered to pay restitution in the sum of $1,125,022.58.After trial Supreme Court, inter alia, found that in all respects the defendant was not credible. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
We lambasted Reckis hereand then discussed the defense cert. petition to the Supreme Court here.Boston Scientific Medizintechnik GmbH v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 9:26 am
The Supreme Court in Bates v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Richardson-Merrell, Inc., 584 A.2d 1383, 1385 (Pa. 1991); Niemiera v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:00 am
Pa. 2007); Chamian v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
Home Depot , 2023 Pa. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 4:07 am
Baumhammers, 938 A.2d 286 (Pa. 2007). [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am
The Supreme Court split, however, on what the appropriate standard for assessing the existence of a duty, vel non, in maritime law, where the federal courts must act as common law courts in developing legal rules and principles. [read post]
11 May 2021, 9:47 am
If the full appellate court affirms, the Supreme Court may well grant cert and determine this issue because the Ninth Circuit decision is directly at odds with a First Circuit ruling involving an identical Massachusetts law. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
AbortionKF228.R59 H85 2010Roe v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 6:03 am
Pa. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:54 am
Supreme Court's landmark decision in Olmstead v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 10:07 am
Cal.; August 4, 2011) The US Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 9:15 am
In August of 2011, Public Citizen fired the first shot across the bow in our attempts to overturn the Supreme Court’s decision in PLIVA v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
Unfortunately it appears that, instead of (or perhaps in addition to, given the recent election results) the Ten Commandments, there’s another commandment that the Alabama Supreme Court is following: Thou Shalt (if you’re an Alabamian) Recover From An Out-Of-State Drug Company.While the Alabama Supreme Court certainly has the power to abandon the notion of manufacturer liability for defects in its products (unlike a federal… [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:20 am
Dunham v. [read post]
