Search for: "J. F. Johnson" Results 241 - 260 of 797
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2018, 5:27 pm by Wolfgang Demino
, 746 F.3d 633, 636 (5th Cir. 2014) ("[J]urisdictional facts are determined at the time of removal, and consequently post-removal events do not affect that properly established jurisdiction. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 5:05 am
Scott Gerien, attorney, Dickensen Peatman & Fogarty, Napa, California.Mark J. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 9:21 am by Thomas D. Nevins
Johnson & Johnson, 799 F.3d 202 (2d Cir. 2015).[1] The Second Circuit relied on the language of the Robinson-Patman Act itself as setting forth competitive injury as an essential element of a claim brought under that Act: the effect of such discrimination [the price differential] may be substantially to lessen competition . . . or to injure, destroy, or prevent competition with any person who . . . knowingly receives the benefit of such discrimination . . . . [read post]