Search for: "J. et al v. Smith et al"
Results 241 - 260
of 337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2008, 4:23 pm
” • Although studies have shown modest reductions in some vitamins and other nutrients after pasteurization of milk, these changes are insignificant according to a review by Potter et al (1984), human nutrition studies have shown no advantage of raw over pasteurized milk. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:23 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Supreme Court decision in Stern v. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 11:52 am
I am happy to announce the publication of my article: "A Lex Mercatoria for Corporate Social Responsibility Codes Without the State? [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:33 am
See, e.g., Ronald Randall et al., Racial Representativeness of Juries: An Analysis of Source List and Administrative Effects on the Jury Pool, 29 Just. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:33 am
See, e.g., Ronald Randall et al., Racial Representativeness of Juries: An Analysis of Source List and Administrative Effects on the Jury Pool, 29 Just. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 3:52 pm
[J&J], a manufacturer and seller of cosmetic talc. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 6:08 pm
Reported by: J Schneider, MPH, J Mohle-Boetani, MD, D Vugia, MD, California Dept of Public Health. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm
LARACH and GREAT AMERICAN CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 6:48 am
Riegel et al. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
We're supporting Julie Niesen et al.'s memorandum in support of jurisdiction, and asking the Ohio Supreme Court to consider the question, on which we think the Court of Appeals erred. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Hitachi et al (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC sets new test for ‘inequitable’ patent prosecution: Therasense v Becton, Dickinson & Co (JIPLP) CAFC validity determination undone by appellant via patent reexamination? [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Hitachi et al (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC sets new test for ‘inequitable’ patent prosecution: Therasense v Becton, Dickinson & Co (JIPLP) CAFC validity determination undone by appellant via patent reexamination? [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 1:29 pm
One of the most remarkable, and objectionable, aspects of the third edition was its failure to engage with Federal Rule of Evidence of 703, and the need for courts to assess the validity of individual studies relied upon. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 6:29 pm
” IARC Monograph for Carbon Black, Titanium Dioxide & Talc, vol 93 (2010); Robert Baan, et al., “Carcinogenicity of carbon black, titanium dioxide, and talc,” 7 Lancet Oncology 295 (2006)5. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
Tinker et al. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
Post-AIA (Point Estimate) We thank LaTia Brand of Harrity Analytics and the Stanford NPE Database, described in Shawn Miller et al., Who’s Suing Us? [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
Post-AIA (Point Estimate) We thank LaTia Brand of Harrity Analytics and the Stanford NPE Database, described in Shawn Miller et al., Who’s Suing Us? [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am
Last week in the courts On 31 October 2022, Nicklin J dismissed the libel claim brought by Sir James Dyson against Channel 4 and ITN in Dyson & Ors v Channel Four Television Corporation and Anor [2022] EWHC 2718 (KB). [read post]
