Search for: "JANE DOES 1-2" Results 241 - 260 of 988
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2014, 9:02 am by Steve Vladeck
Jane already flagged the merits brief filed by the U.S. government on September 17 in al Bahlul v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 12:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
In the interests of space, I'll skip items 1 and 2 (though you can read them in the opinion), and focus on item 3: The above allegations taken together sufficiently allege background indicia of sex discrimination. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 6:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Colonel Victory. 3 short knocks, 1 long. ...-. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 9:22 am by Samantha Rocco
Now, let’s say Jane does not sell her ABC Corporation shares, and instead, Jane transfers the 100 shares, which have a fair market value of $150, to XYZ Charity. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 12:13 am
A mark is deemed to be used in commerce when it is either (1) placed on goods and sold or transported in commerce or (2) displayed in the sale, advertising or rendering of services in commerce. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:11 am
John Does et al California Central District Court Filed: February 28, 2008 Plaintiff: Bandmerch, LLC Defendant: John Does, Jane Does, XYZ Company Case Number: 2:2008cv01379 Realty World, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
DOE This case concerns the termination of parental rights of Jane Doe III (Doe). [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:29 am by Paul Cassell
Between 1999 and 2007, Jeffrey Epstein sexually abused more than 30 minor girls, including my clients, Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 6:14 am
Jane Pauk of Phoenix demonstrates at the Supreme Court after the justices ruled on Arizona''s immigration law. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 11:06 am by Eugene Volokh
Jane Doe sued Anonymous #1, claiming that he sexually touched her while providing "wellness treatments" as a "Nutrition-Coaching-Exercise-Mindfulness" expert at a "boutique quantum healing practice. [read post]
30 May 2022, 8:25 am by Eric Goldman
Courts in the Fifth Circuit consider: (1) the type of mark allegedly infringed; (2) the similarity between the two marks; (3) the similarity of the products or services; (4) the identity of retail outlets and purchasers; (5) the identity of the advertising media used; (6) the defendant’s intent; and (7) actual confusion. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 1:34 pm
As a reminder, the following italicized questions come from Jane C. [read post]