Search for: "JANES DOES 2-10 " Results 241 - 260 of 388
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2020, 11:40 pm by Schachtman
But why does truth have to be the first casualty? [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Second Circuit’s opinion does not discuss that theory, even though the district court had invoked it to certify the class. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 2:07 pm by Mark Walsh
The court takes the bench at 10 a.m., and Justice Clarence Thomas is absent. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
”[10] Before it proceeded to address the unconscionability of the agreement the Supreme Court noted that the choice of law was the Netherlands but the parties chose not to bring evidence on Dutch law on unconscionability. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 7:23 am by Dr Richard Cornes
Lord Neuberger’s comments on October 2 included: Rights, whether human rights or other rights, are valueless if they cannot be enforced in court. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 7:22 am
He has become $28 billion richer, and (by his choice) he is paying perhaps $2 billion in taxes on his $5 billion realization. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
United States, et al.Court: U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-35592, 10-35611, 10-35458 September 8, 2011 Judge: Paez Areas of Law: Agriculture Law, Environmental Law, Government & Administrative Law, Injury Law Plaintiffs, 134 farmers whose crops suffered as a result of the federal Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) use of the herbicide Oust, sued the federal government and Oust's manufacturer (DuPont). [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm by John Elwood
The plaintiffs in the case, shareholders in Facebook, allege that the company defrauded them by its description of “risk factors” in their annual Form 10-K and quarterly Form 10-Q filings. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  The following matters are listed for next term Economou v De Freitas  13 June 2016, listed for 6-10 days [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
The amicus brief focuses on the importance of the case for artists and freedom of expression, framing the February ruling as a threat to the First Amendment.[38] Specifically, the coalition seeks the court’s clarification that an artist’s intent to sell or otherwise commercialize their art does not impact the balancing test between trademark owners’ rights and artists’ rights.[39] In an interesting comparison, the brief notes that Hermès itself took the name… [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am by INFORRM
On 10 May 2023, Fancourt J began hearing the trial of four claims in the Mirror Group managed “hacking” litigation. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 8:13 am by rstokes
At a given time, approximately 6-10% of incarcerated women are pregnant (3). [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 2:59 am
  The House version of the bill costs $8 billion over ten years, but does not yet have sufficient offsets. [read post]