Search for: "JOHN ROBERTS" Results 241 - 260 of 20,381
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2024, 8:35 am by Tom Smith
Justice Alito had been confirmed that same day, Chief Justice John Roberts four months earlier. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 10:35 am by Howard Bashman
The post “Fishing for John Roberts’s Executive-Branch Records; A justice delayed could become a justice denied” appeared first on How Appealing. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm by renholding
I’d like to thank members of the SEC staff for their work on these final rules, including: Mellissa Duru, Luna Bloom, Elliot Staffin, Kristin Baldwin, Valian Afshar, Almaze Semere, Dennis Hermreck, Nolan McWilliams, Grace Baer, Lindsay McCord, Ethan Horowitz, Robert Errett, Deegi Biteng, Adam Turk, Ted Yu, Liz Walsh, Duc Dang, Brad Skinner, Mike Reedich, Kat Bagley, Cheryl Brown, Jeb Byrne, Nabeel Cheema, John Fieldsend, Jason Weidberg, Michael Coco, Angie Kim, Charli… [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:40 am by Ellena Erskine
Here’s the Wednesday morning read: US Supreme Court seeks security funding to protect justices, homes (Nate Raymond, Reuters) The Perils of Inconsistent Judicial Role Morality (Steve Vladeck, One First) In Trump Cases, Supreme Court Cannot Avoid Politics (Adam Liptak, The New York Times) The Supreme Court Just Delivered a Rare Self-Own for John Roberts (Richard Hasen, Slate) The tyranny of America’s Supreme Court (Edward Luce, The Financial Times) The post The morning… [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
(John Roberts, in Rucho, actually had pointed to H.R. 1 as an example of constitutionally sound response to gerrymandering, though he probably assumed it would not pass!) [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:49 am by Eric Segall
In any event, the Court does recognize that there is a case where a state (a Southern one) did actually disqualify someone under Section 3:In 1868, the Governor of Georgia refused to commission John Christy, who had won the most votes in a congressional election, because—in the Governor’s view—Section 3 made Christy ineligible to serve. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am by David Pocklington
John Hoveton [2024] ECC Nor 2] [Top of section] [Top of post] Some information about the church and some photographs can be found at: https://www.britainexpress.com/counties/norfolk/churches/hoveton-st-john.htm Exhumation Other Re St. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 7:16 pm by Howard Bashman
“The Supreme Court Just Delivered a Rare Self-Own for John Roberts”: Law professor Richard L. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 3:25 pm by Rick Hasen
It… Continue reading The post My New One at Slate: “The Supreme Court Just Delivered a Rare Self-Own for John Roberts” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
 Pix credit here The majority’s choice of a different path leaves the remaining Justices with a choice of how to respond. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
[Professor Shugerman's argument that the 1793 Hamilton Document, that is, a list of "every person holding any civil office or employment under the United States, (except the judges)," was intended to ensure compliance with the Constitution's Sinecure Clause lacks support.] [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 3:37 pm by Howard Bashman
John Roberts’s Gay-Rights Surprise: A revelation that would have prevented his nomination doesn’t disrupt it. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 3:27 pm by Rick Hasen
NYT: When the Supreme Court knocked down a core part of the Voting Rights Act in 2013, Chief Justice John G. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 9:26 am by GSU Law Student
For Black History Month, the Law Library will spotlight Black law figures throughout history and their contributions to the legal field. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:12 am by Chase Hattaway, RumbergerKirk
Chief Justice John Roberts, speaking for the majority, wrote that while affirmative action policies are “commendable” in the goals they seek to achieve, “racial classifications are simply too pernicious to permit. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:12 am by Chase Hattaway, RumbergerKirk
Chief Justice John Roberts, speaking for the majority, wrote that while affirmative action policies are “commendable” in the goals they seek to achieve, “racial classifications are simply too pernicious to permit. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:12 am by Chase Hattaway, RumbergerKirk
Chief Justice John Roberts, speaking for the majority, wrote that while affirmative action policies are “commendable” in the goals they seek to achieve, “racial classifications are simply too pernicious to permit. [read post]