Search for: "James v. Social Security Administration" Results 241 - 260 of 333
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2011, 12:35 pm by The Legal Blog
The reason of the rule, which makes a precedent binding lies in the desire to secure uniformity and certainty in the law.Tribhovandas Purshottamdas Thakkar v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am by Charles Fried
That “fundamental” change was worked seventy-five years before by the Social Security Act and fifty years before with Medicare. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am by David Kopel
Michael, a building belonging to the established Church of England, of which King James II was the supreme head. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am by msatta
They could frustrate government responses to social problems in a way not seen in America since the Great Depression. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
In October 2018, the New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA) asked us to revise Rule 202.5(c) to read as follows: The Commission has adopted the policy that in any civil lawsuit brought by it or in any administrative proceeding of an accusatory nature pending before it, a defendant or respondent may consent to a judgment or order in which he admits, denies, or states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings.[7] I agree with the petitioner that… [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 7:06 pm
They remains suspicious of unguided autonomous decision making and directionless markets as the 1974 version, but the appeal is to a broader audience, and the invocation is to  the promise of state based quality control measures in the form of increasingly complex webs of administrative discretion. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Administrative LawFederal administrative law / by Gary Lawson.Lawson, Gary, 1958-St. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 9:29 pm by RegBlog
“Objective reasonableness” is an appropriate touchstone for regulating force, but the ill-informed Graham v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 11:14 am by sydniemery
Sentencing Guidelines to Justify Limiting the Impact of Johnson v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm by Guest Author
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan and Michael C. Dorf
Again, if the administration continues to be committed to its existing strategy, none of us should currently be any the wiser. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
  With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 5:00 am by Bob Bauer
This would certainly be a case where the president’s actions exposed him or her as a threat to national security. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm by Ronald Collins
His father, James Harlan, was quite a persona in his own right. [read post]