Search for: "Justice v. Alexander" Results 241 - 260 of 1,300
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2022, 11:10 am by Katherine Pompilio
Reynolds traced the influence of the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 11:33 am by Katherine Pompilio
Reynolds traced the influence of the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
In late October, the Department of Justice (DOJ) resolved its first-ever criminal enforcement actions brought under the CPSA against corporations. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 8:09 am by Josh Blackman
Maryland, Chief Justice Marshall held that a state cannot tax a federal instrumentality, and from a different direction, for example, in Printz v. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am by Eleonora Rosati
The drinks are on Eagle Rare as the Court of Appeal grounds American EagleLiverpool Gin Distillery Ltd v Sazerac Brands [2021] EWCA Civ 1207 (August 2021) In Volume 8 I described how the High Court, in the form of Mr Justice Fancourt, decided that an AMERICAN EAGLE bourbon whiskey infringed Sazerac’s rights in EAGLE RARE for whiskey as it would indirectly confuse consumers into believing the two brands were connected. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 8:28 am by David Bernstein
He was also the single most hostile Justice on the Court to the rights of Chinese Americans, and expressed that opposition in overtly racist terms—including in Plessy v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 5:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
While the states were seen as “laboratories of democracy” by Justice Brandeis in New State Ice Company v Liebmann – in recent years states have become “laboratories of national partisan politics,” to adopt Jessica Bulman-Pozen’s gloss on Brandeis. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 6:00 am by CMS
So I think on this I would adopt the words of Chief Justice Holt, in the great case of Coggs v Barnard in 1703, when he said: “I have stirred these points, which wiser heads in time may settle. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 11:22 am by Emily Coward
The Batson test has provided limited protection against discrimination in jury selection, as Justice Thurgood Marshall famously predicted in his Batson concurrence. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 6:35 pm
Yet this line of questioning, tangential as it may seem, helped expose the Texas law for what it is: a brazen attempt to circumvent Roe v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 6:35 pm by llaird
Yet this line of questioning, tangential as it may seem, helped expose the Texas law for what it is: a brazen attempt to circumvent Roe v. [read post]