Search for: "Kennedy v. Austin" Results 241 - 260 of 308
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Kennedy v The National Trust for Scotland, heard 21 November 2017 (Sir David Eady). [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 4:04 am
  Tuesday on Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:06 am by dferriero
Truman Presidential Library and MuseumLaurie Austin, Audiovisual Archivist, the Harry S. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:06 am by dferriero
Truman Presidential Library and MuseumLaurie Austin, Audiovisual Archivist, the Harry S. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 6:33 am by Tejinder Singh
Joe Birkenstock – 2 Promoted Comments One predicted electoral consequence of overturning Austin v. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 10:00 pm by binder'sblog
John Fitzgerald Kennedy published his senior thesis at Harvard in 1940, “Why England Slept. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:17 am by Andrew Hamm
Question: You write of Justice John Marshall Harlan’s famous solo dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:18 am by Adam Feldman
At the end of Gorsuch’s first full term in 2017, Justice Anthony Kennedy announced his retirement. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 2:08 pm
If you're the sort of person who reads transcripts of Supreme Court oral arguments, and if you have even a passing interest in civil rights law, then you probably figured that Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act was history.The case was Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 10:04 am by June Casey
Monday, November 23, 2015 at 5:00 pm followed by a 6:00 pm reception 
 Harvard Law School Ames Courtroom, Austin Hall (Directions) 
1585 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge Co-sponsored by the Edmond J. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 11:10 am by Walter Weber
” Justice Kennedy asked the pertinent question in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 11:12 am by Fred Wertheimer
This doctrine was used by the Roberts Court majority to strike down the ban on independent expenditures by corporations, which the Court previously had upheld in Austin v. [read post]