Search for: "Latham v. Latham"
Results 241 - 260
of 337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Stronski, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Tuesday, July 11, 2023 Tags: Board composition, directors, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC enforcement, Shareholder activism, universal proxy rule X Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:58 am
Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart in Jacobellis v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 4:19 am
The nearly-annual IP Publishers and Editors Lunch, which the recession nearly killed off last year, is back again this year, thanks to the generous hospitality of the London office of Latham & Watkins LLP. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 8:11 am
Thomas, who is representing himself, cited a 1987 Georgia Supreme Court case known as Cherry v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 11:55 pm
Garre, now chair of the appellate practice at Latham & Watkins, testified about the case at a Dec. 2 hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:00 am
The following online bulletin by two Latham & Watkins lawyers for the ABA IP Litigation Committee also provides a good listing of some recent trademark parody cases: The Satire/Parody Distinction in Copyright and Trademark Law (here in PDF, 17 pages). [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Dubofsky, Latham & Watkins LLP, on Thursday, February 29, 2024 Tags: Activism, ESG, Proxy advisors, Shareholder activism BlackRock Updated 2024 U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Dubofsky, Latham & Watkins LLP, on Thursday, February 29, 2024 Tags: Activism, ESG, Proxy advisors, Shareholder activism BlackRock Updated 2024 U.S. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 2:33 am
I've become expert at some strange topics during my time here, including slurry separators (Farmers Build -v- Carrier) and mortuary equipment. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 1:01 am
Ibrahim, William & Mary Law School, on Wednesday, November 2, 2016 Tags: Capital formation, Crowdfunding, Investor protection, IPOs, JOBS Act, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation,Small firms, Tech companies ISS Proposes New 2017 Voting Policies Posted by Lyuba Goltser, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, on Wednesday, November 2, 2016 Tags: Boards of Directors, Charter & bylaws, Dual-class stock, Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, IPOs,ISS, Proxy advisors, Proxy voting,… [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 6:02 am
Jackson, Harvard Law School, on Saturday, April 22, 2017 Tags: Accountability, Bank boards, Banks, Boards of Directors, CFPB, Compliance & ethics, Consumer protection, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Incentives, Misconduct, Oversight, Proxy advisors, Risk oversight, Shareholder voting, Wells Fargo Assessing Financial Advisor Compensation Disclosure Following Vento v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:25 am
Posted by Robbie McLaren and Nick Cline, Latham & Watkins LLP, on Monday, May 29, 2017 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Cross-border transactions, Deal protection, EU, Europe, International governance, Leveraged acquisitions, Mergers & acquisitions, Taxation, UK 2017 Venture Capital Report Posted by Mick Bain and Lia Der Marderosian, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, on Tuesday, May 30, 2017 Tags: Capital formation, Equity-based compensation, Executive Compensation, Firm… [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Stronski, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Tuesday, July 11, 2023 Tags: Board composition, directors, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC enforcement, Shareholder activism, universal proxy rule X Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 6:02 am
Katz, and Sabastian V. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 9:05 am
by Dennis Crouch Timothy Smith v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 4:38 am
Mahoney of Latham & Watkins, LLP will argue the case for the petitioner. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm
The case revolved around a column by Latham entitled “Why left feminists don’t like kids”. [read post]
17 May 2010, 12:58 am
The May issue also contains a useful article by Robert Latham on the new TSA regulatory framework. [read post]
17 May 2010, 12:58 am
The May issue also contains a useful article by Robert Latham on the new TSA regulatory framework. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm
In RSPCA (NSW) v Davies [2011] NSWSC 1445, Latham J awarded the RSPCA in NSW damages of Aus$100,000 for defamatory material posted on a website authored by retired “forensic computer detective” Mal Davies. [read post]
