Search for: "Law v. United States" Results 241 - 260 of 68,310
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2024, 9:45 am by Unknown
**Reports & journal articles:"Assessing the quality of data on international migration flows in Europe: The case of undercounting," Migration Studies, vol. 12, no. 2 (June 2024) [open access]Country Reports (AIDA, April 2024) - Updated profiles for Sweden and the UK.The Evolving Nature of the Vulnerability Concept in European Union Asylum Law, Prague Law Working Paper, no. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
United States and some miscellaneous examples drawn from congressional records. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:35 am by SHG
It is our solemn duty to diligently guard these rights regardless of the crime charged, the reputation of the accused, or the pressure to convict (see Boyd v United States, 116 US 616, 635 [1886] [“It is the duty of courts to be watchful for the constitutional rights of the citizen, and against any stealthy encroachments thereon”]). [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by The Regulatory Review
In the same statement, Chew also explained that the ban was “ironic” because “the freedom of expression on TikTok reflects the same American values that make the United States a beacon of freedom. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
” Conservatives, Time notes, once looked to universities to “reproduce the middle and upper echelons of Christian society in the United States—something classical liberals from Thomas Jefferson to today’s postliberal academics on the right … have historically appreciated and felt worth conserving. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:45 pm by Howard Bashman
“A SCOTUS Firehose in Trump v United States”: Michael C. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:59 pm by Michael C. Dorf
United States, I find myself somewhat at a loss as to what points to focus on here. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:45 pm
Justice Barrett observes that immunity will protect the ex-President in his state court cases — where it is especially needed:Let me ask you about state prosecutions because, if the president has some kind of immunity that's implicit in Article II then that immunity would protect him in -- from state prosecutions as well. [read post]