Search for: "Lee v. Frank" Results 241 - 260 of 315
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 1:15 pm
Supreme Court ,   Lee Epstein   31. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 6:39 pm
Since our appellate courts have held that the surcharge is "punishment", People v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Canadian Association of Law Libraries
However, as Frank Pasquale [1] rightly suggests in his thoughtful foreword, this is also “a collection that should be read by a wide range of audiences both in and around the legal profession” (p v). [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 1:52 pm
Jefferson--my favorite president in US History.Eric Muller posted a "cool" letter he found relating to the Gibbons v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
(Patent Prospector) US-Korea adopt patent prosecution highway (Law360) (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property)    Global Global - General Obama, patent reform, patent litigation in the USA and Europe – IP Think Tank podcast 26 January 2009 (IP Think Tank) Intangible values collapse – the old 70% to 80% claim is now officially dead and buried (IAM) (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Managing value in a shrinking economy: the IP audit (IP Frontline) Downturn… [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 7:36 pm by fjhinojosa
Kastenberg, The Limits of Executive Power in Crisis in the Early Republic: Martin v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:49 pm by Ronald K.L. Collins
When value-driven philosophers, reformers, or jurists venture to set limits on free speech, as Anthony Comstock did in Traps for the Young (1883) or as Justice Frank Murphy did in Chaplinsky v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 3:23 am by Thornhill Law Firm, A PLC
L 11-148), and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Pub. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]