Search for: "Lewis v. Chicago" Results 241 - 260 of 388
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2010, 7:42 am by Lyle Denniston
  The ruling came in the case of Lewis v. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of Sole Cleaning Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2009, 5:53 pm
(in support of petitioners) Docket: 08-974 Title: Lewis, et al. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
On 23 March 2022 Steyn J heard an application in the case of QRT -v- JBE QB-2022-000825. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 6:06 am
., on Sunday, November 25, 2018 Tags: Board independence, Board leadership, Board performance, Boards of Directors, Director nominations, Director qualifications, Engagement, Management, Non-executive chairman A Series of Avoidable Missteps: Fiduciary Breaches in Connection with the Sale of a Company Posted by Gail Weinstein, Steven Epstein, and Matthew V. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:00 am by Tim Eavenson
Both noted that the Supreme Court was about to weigh in on the Ledbetter Act for the first time in Lewis v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 3:43 am
City of Chicago, No. 08-974 - T VIISee issue description (+briefs links) at SCOTUSblogo SCOTUS docket hereo Noted here: SCOTUSblog (w/ brief links and noting that the Court has invited the views of the SG)2nd CircuitDuffett v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment Posted by Maximilian Muhn, University of Chicago Booth School of Business, on Thursday, February 1, 2024 Tags: Consumer Behavior, ESG, Financial disclosures, Firm disclosures, Purchase decisions Tornetta v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment Posted by Maximilian Muhn, University of Chicago Booth School of Business, on Thursday, February 1, 2024 Tags: Consumer Behavior, ESG, Financial disclosures, Firm disclosures, Purchase decisions Tornetta v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:12 am by Stephen Wermiel
  Last month she told the editorial board of the Chicago Tribune that perhaps the Supreme Court should not have ruled in the case of Bush v. [read post]