Search for: "MARK GRAY v. THE STATE" Results 241 - 260 of 456
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
(Chicago IP Litigation Blog) Patent Compliance Group - First false marking declaratory judgment action filed: North States Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 10:48 am
324/09 L’Oréal SA and others v eBay International AG and others. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:53 am
Supp. 2d 477, 496-97 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) (citations and quotation marks omitted).The same result also occurred in an aspect of the Bartlett litigation that did not get appealed to the Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
 (Gray on Claims) District Court N D California: Compliance with accused industry standard does not justify joinder of defendants in a single action: Finisar Corporation v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Varian (PATracer)   US Copyright The importance of registering copyright in the United States: Elsevier B.V. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Varian (PATracer)   US Copyright The importance of registering copyright in the United States: Elsevier B.V. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Innovationpartners) Germany Ferrero v FIFA (in World Cup trade mark dispute) - 1:0 says the German Bundesgerichtshof (IPKat) India WIPO Director General pledges support for India's visually impaired community (WIPO) Delhi High Court on working of patents and S 107A(b) Strix Limited v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Innovationpartners) Germany Ferrero v FIFA (in World Cup trade mark dispute) - 1:0 says the German Bundesgerichtshof (IPKat) India WIPO Director General pledges support for India's visually impaired community (WIPO) Delhi High Court on working of patents and S 107A(b) Strix Limited v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Innovationpartners)   Germany Ferrero v FIFA (in World Cup trade mark dispute) – 1:0 says the German Bundesgerichtshof (IPKat)   India WIPO Director General pledges support for India’s visually impaired community (WIPO) Delhi High Court on working of patents and S 107A(b) Strix Limited v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
China considered sold ‘within the United States’ for infringement purposes: SEB S.A. v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 11:49 pm
Knowles stated that she thought the Supreme Court would provide a more favorable ruling for GSK than the Federal Circuit did, Prof. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
CTM prices drop 40% (The Gray Blog)   France French approach to interpretation of patent claims (International Law Office)   India Parallel imports and exhaustion: A different framework for copyrights? [read post]