Search for: "MATTER OF T F" Results 241 - 260 of 13,928
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Consequently, this feature leaves the actual subject-matter covered by the claim in doubt. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 9:31 am by Jon Sands
Jordan, 256 F.3d 922 (9th Cir. 2001). [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This was clear from decisions T 305/08 and T 452/05. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 10:48 am
"Judge Fay, for the Eleventh Circuit, in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:48 pm by paperstreet
Hulu, LLC, the Court stated that “[t]his court has never set forth a bright line rule requiring district courts to construe claims before determining subject matter eligibility. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 9:35 am by John-Paul Boyd KC
I really couldn’t care less; it happens, and it happens a lot.) [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 3:27 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See Cooper, 154 F.3d at 1331 (“[T]he law doesnot impose an impossible standard of independence oncorroborative evidence by requiring that every point of a reduction to practice be corroborated by evidence having asource totally independent of the inventor[.] [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 5:16 pm
His conviction goes from that F-1 all the way to the F-5. [read post]
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 564 F.3d 1256, 1268 n.12 (11th Cir. 2009) Next, the district court noted that Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 21 and 42 – the two Federal Rules addressing severance – are distinct. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:56 pm by Kevin
“I really regret the matter,” he said, though in print you can’t see whether someone is rolling their eyes or not. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 1:25 am by Rose Hughes
The Guidelines currently require that, when amending or adapting the description in line with the claims, the applicant must either delete subject matter not covered by the claims, or explicitly state in the description that such subject matter is not part of the invention (F-IV, 4.3). [read post]
26 Dec 2021, 2:36 am by Rose Hughes
 Article 84 EPC states that "[t]he claims shall define the matter for which protection is sought. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 7:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Kohl’s Corp., 718 F.3d 1098 (9th Cir. 2013), stated that “[t]he legislature’s decision to prohibit a particular misleading advertising practice is evidence that the legislature has deemed that the practice constitutes a ‘material’ misrepresentation, and courts must defer to that determination. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 10:37 am by Jon Sands
§ 3553(f)(1)(A)–(C) (emphasis added).1 As a matter of first impression, we must interpret the “and” joining subsections (A), (B), and (C) under § 3553(f)(1). [read post]