Search for: "MCGraw v. McGraw"
Results 241 - 260
of 270
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2020, 10:37 am
Bethel v. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm
On the same day, Warby J heard an application in the case of Theedom v Nourish Trading Ltd Green J also heard an application in the case of Smith v Persons Unknown. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 11:55 am
(The Publishers also reached a settlement of their case, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 9:11 am
Cunniffe (1st Cir. 2011) and ACLU v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 3:18 am
A 1998 trial court decision in A&A Properties NY Ltd. v Soundings Condominium broke new ground by granting the unit holder’s application to inspect the list. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:31 am
McGraw-Hill, Inc., 411 F.3d 63, 67 (2d Cir. 2005). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 3:44 am
Miami Beach v McGraw-Hill Cos., Inc., 120 AD3d 1052, 1055; see World Ambulette Transp., Inc. v Lee, 161 AD3d 1028; Matter of Pokoik v 575 Realties, Inc., 143 AD3d 487). [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 4:20 am
The complaint also names as defendants McGraw Hill Companies, the corporate parent of S&P, and Moody’s. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 3:44 am
CAFC Reverses TTAB's "COLD WAR MUSEUM" Decision Regarding Evidence of Record in Cancellation Proceeding CAFC Oral Argument: CAFC Hears Oral Argument in "CRASH DUMMIES" Appeal CAFC Hears Oral Argument in Southern Cal v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 4:28 am
[v] Responsiveness: Building relationships with forensic investigators before a cyber-attack occurs will help achieve two main goals. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 4:02 pm
Abreu v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 3:30 am
McGraw Hill Cos., Inc., 120 AD3d 1052 [1st Dept 2014]; see also Novikov v Oceana Holdings Corp., 46 Misc3d 561 [Sup Ct, Kings County 2014] [discussed here]). [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 8:11 pm
” The Ontario Superior Court of Justice just released a new decision in CCLA v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 3:26 am
I’ve named it after Quick Draw McGraw, one of my favorite, classic Saturday morning TV cartoons, and because it so nicely describes the unusual buy-sell mechanism enforced by Brooklyn Commercial Division Justice David Schmidt in his fascinating decision earlier this month in Mintz v Pazer, Decision and Order, Index No. 502127/13 [Sup Ct, Kings County Mar. 12, 2014]. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
ACLU, and again in Ashcroft v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
In Minnesota v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 8:40 am
Véase, por ejemplo, A. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:19 pm
V. identified error patterns that contribute to in-patient trauma deaths. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:30 pm
JC: give us more of flavor of how much of your takedown effort is automated v. human and what interaction is? [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 1:41 pm
GradeGuru (http://www.gradeguru.com/sps/homePagenlu.do )GradeGuru is owned by McGraw Hill Education. [read post]
