Search for: "MERRELL v. U.S." Results 241 - 260 of 352
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by admin
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., which involved a claim that birth defects were caused by a spermicidal jelly, the U.S. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 10:28 am by Shea Denning
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993), Rule 702(a1) was not amended. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 10:28 am by Shea Denning
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993), Rule 702(a1) was not amended. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 9:21 am by Schachtman
Merrell Dow Pharm., 509 U.S. 579, 590 (1993), to find that expert witness opinion testimony is reliable before they consider it. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals regarding important expert testimony requires the appellate court to order a new trial, regardless of whether there was actually any substantive error in the expert testimony heard or not heard by the jury. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 11:52 am by Schachtman
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc., 43 F.3d 1311, 1320 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 516 U.S. 869 (1995) [Daubert II]. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 12:34 pm by Schachtman
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and which did involve any Rule 702 challenge to the use of a flawed statistical analysis. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
According to the rules outlined in the most famous Supreme Court case on this topic (Daubert v. [read post]