Search for: "MOBIL OIL CORP." Results 241 - 260 of 374
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2009, 9:25 am by Don Cruse
In a class certification appeal, the Court speaks to the UCC's good-faith requirement Exxon Mobil Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 7:01 am by Christopher Faulkner, Marcel Plichta
Daniel Byman *** Between conscription, mobilization, and coercion, Vladimir Putin is putting more men under arms than ever. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 4:50 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Among other things, as I noted in a prior post (here), the New York Attorney General has made it clear that he intends to pursue Exxon Mobil Corp. with respect to the oil company giant’s climate-change related disclosures. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 9:34 am
Commentary If the Supreme Court voted immediately in the huge oil spill case heard on Wednesday, and voted the sentiments the Justices expressed throughout 90 minutes of oral argument, this might well be the outcome: Exxon Mobil Corp. and its shipping subsidiary may well have to pay some punitive damages, but not $2.5 billion. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:16 am by Emma Snell
The Biden administration accused the Russian government of helping Iran’s blacklisted military unit — the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps — sell hundreds of millions of dollars of oil around the globe, while the sanctions were targeted at those companies and individuals allegedly involved in the smuggling. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
   The Court noted that the Seventh Circuit, in Cunningham Charter Corp. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 5:38 am
Feb. 24, 1999); Mobil Oil Corp. v Filtrol Corp., 501 F.2d 282, 291-92 (9th Cir. 1974) (expressing doubt over the possibility of divided infringement liability).A party cannot avoid infringement, however, simply by contracting out steps of a patented process to another entity. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 10:49 am
Mobil Oil Corp., 882 F.2d 490, 493 (11th Cir. 1989) (stating in a commercial lease setting that Florida courts require a plaintiff to show both procedural and substantive unconscionability). [read post]